Meropenem plus amikacin versus piperacillin-tazobactam plus netilmicin as empiric therapy for high-risk febrile neutropenia in children

被引:24
作者
Aksoylar, S
Çetingül, N
Kantar, M
Karapinar, D
Kavakli, K
Kansoy, S
机构
[1] Ege Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat Oncol, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat Hematol, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
aminoglycoside; cancer children; fibrile neutropenia; high-risk; meropenem; piperacillin/tazobactam;
D O I
10.1080/08880010490277321
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of meropenum plus amikacin compared with piperacillin-tazobactam plus netilmicin for initial empirical antibiotic treatment of high-fisk febrile neutropenia in children with cancer. Patients with hematologic malignancy (leukemia or stage III/IV non-Hodgkin lymphoma) who presented with fever and neutrepenia (ANC < 500/mm(3)) and patients with solid tumors who presented with fever and severe. neutropenia (ANC < 100/mm(3)) were considered to be at high risk and eligible,for this study. In this prospective study, 33 patients with 50 febrile neutropenic episodes received iv meropenem (20 mg/kg every 8 h) plus amikacin (15 mg/kg/d in 2 divided doses) (in 31 episodes) or piperacillin/tazobactam (100 mg/4 mg/kg every 8 h) plus netilmicin (7 mg/kg every 24 h) (in 19 episodes). Clinical response was determined at 72 h and at completion of the therapy. The groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, initial ANC, use of growth factors, and classification of the infections. An infection was documented microbiologically in 12 episodes (39%) in the meropenem plus amikacin group and in 8 episodes (42%) in the piperacillin/tazobactam plus netilmicin group. Of the 22 microbiological isolates, 37% were gram-positives, 45 % were gram-negatives, and 18 % were fungi. Most of the clinically documented infections were of lower respiratory tract, gastrointestinal mucosa, or urinary tract origin. The mean duration of neutropenia was 9 days in both groups. Fever persisted for 1-30 days (mean 3 vs. 5 days). The success rate with initial empiric therapy was 52 % in the meropenem plus amikacin and 42 % in the piperacillin/tazobactam plus netmicin g-roup, respectively (p =.5). Total success rate (with or without modification) was 97 % vs. 90 % in the episodes. Three patients died due to infection (I vs. 2 patients). No major adverse effects were, observed in each group. Empirical therapy with meropenem plus amikacin or piperacillin/azobactam plus netilmicin effective and safe in pediatric cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 123
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Cost-effectiveness of cefepime plus netilmicin or ceftazidime plus amikacin or meropenem monotherapy in febrile neutropenic children with malignancy in Turkey [J].
Agaoglu, L ;
Devecioglu, O ;
Anak, S ;
Karakas, Z ;
Yalman, N ;
Biner, B ;
Eryilmaz, E ;
Goksan, B ;
Unuvar, A ;
Agirbasli, H ;
Can, M ;
Bilgen, H ;
Gedikoglu, G .
JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 13 (03) :281-287
[2]   Evaluation of risk prediction criteria for episodes of febrile neutropenia in children with cancer [J].
Alexander, SW ;
Wade, KC ;
Hibberd, PL ;
Parsons, SK .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2002, 24 (01) :38-42
[3]  
Alexander SW, 2002, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, P1239
[4]   A randomized prospective multicentre trial of cefpirome versus piperacillin-tazobactam in febrile neutropenia [J].
Bauduer, F ;
Cousin, T ;
Boulat, O ;
Rigal-Huguet, F ;
Molina, L ;
Fegueux, N ;
Jourdan, E ;
Boiron, JM ;
Reiffers, J .
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2001, 42 (03) :379-386
[5]  
Bohme A, 1998, Eur J Med Res, V3, P324
[6]   Empiric antibiotic monotherapy with carbapenems in febrile neutropenia: A review [J].
Cometta, A ;
Glauser, MP .
JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 8 (05) :375-381
[7]   A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing piperacillin-tazobactam with and without amikacin as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia [J].
Del Favero, A ;
Menichetti, F ;
Martino, P ;
Bucaneve, G ;
Micozzi, A ;
Gentile, G ;
Furno, P ;
Russo, D ;
D'Antonio, D ;
Ricci, P ;
Martino, B ;
Mandelli, F .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 33 (08) :1295-1301
[8]  
Düzova A, 2001, TURKISH J PEDIATR, V43, P105
[9]   Meropenem versus ceftazidime in the treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: A randomized, double-blind trial [J].
Feld, R ;
DePauw, B ;
Berman, S ;
Keating, A ;
Ho, W .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (21) :3690-3698
[10]   Initial empiric therapy of febrile neutropenia with antibiotic monotherapy.: Piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin (1994-1996) [J].
Figuera, R ;
Rivero, N ;
Pajuelo, F ;
Font, P ;
Leyra, F ;
de la Cámara, R ;
Arranz, R ;
Rañada, JMF .
MEDICINA CLINICA, 2001, 116 (16) :610-611