Machine learning predicts the prognosis of breast cancer patients with initial bone metastases

被引:21
作者
Li, Chaofan [1 ]
Liu, Mengjie [1 ]
Li, Jia [1 ]
Wang, Weiwei [1 ]
Feng, Cong [1 ]
Cai, Yifan [1 ]
Wu, Fei [1 ]
Zhao, Xixi [2 ]
Du, Chong [1 ]
Zhang, Yinbin [1 ]
Wang, Yusheng [3 ]
Zhang, Shuqun [1 ]
Qu, Jingkun [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Oncol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Xian, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Otolaryngol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Xian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
breast cancer; bone metastases; XGBoost algorithm; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; SEER; PRIMARY TUMOR; POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; LOCOREGIONAL TREATMENT; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; RESECTION; SURGERY; DELAYS;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.1003976
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundBone is the most common metastatic site of patients with advanced breast cancer and the survival time is their primary concern; however, we lack accurate predictive models in clinical practice. In addition to this, primary surgery for breast cancer patients with bone metastases is still controversial. MethodThe data used for analysis in this study were obtained from the SEER database (2010-2019). We made a COX regression analysis to identify prognostic factors of patients with bone metastatic breast cancer (BMBC). Through cross-validation, we constructed an XGBoost model to predicting survival in patients with BMBC. We also investigated the prognosis of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgical and chemotherapy alone using propensity score matching and K-M survival analysis. ResultsOur validation results showed that the model has high sensitivity, specificity, and correctness, and it is the most accurate one to predict the survival of patients with BMBC (1-year AUC = 0.818, 3-year AUC = 0.798, and 5-year survival AUC = 0.791). The sensitivity of the 1-year model was higher (0.79), while the specificity of the 5-year model was higher (0.86). Interestingly, we found that if the time from diagnosis to therapy was >= 1 month, patients with BMBC had even better survival than those who started treatment immediately (HR = 0.920, 95%CI 0.869-0.974, P < 0.01). The BMBC patients with an income of more than USD$70,000 had better OS (HR = 0.814, 95%CI 0.745-0.890, P < 0.001) and BCSS (HR = 0.808 95%CI 0.735-0.889, P < 0.001) than who with income of < USD$50,000. We also found that compared with chemotherapy alone, neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgical treatment significantly improved OS and BCSS in all molecular subtypes of patients with BMBC, while only the patients with bone metastases only, bone and liver metastases, bone and lung metastases could benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgical treatment. ConclusionWe constructed an AI model to provide a quantitative method to predict the survival of patients with BMBC, and our validation results indicate that this model should be highly reproducible in a similar patient population. We also identified potential prognostic factors for patients with BMBC and suggested that primary surgery followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy might increase survival in a selected subgroup of patients.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, CA Cancer J Clin, DOI DOI 10.3322/caac.20115
[2]   Locoregional treatment versus no treatment of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer: an open-label randomised controlled trial [J].
Badwe, Rajendra ;
Hawaldar, Rohini ;
Nair, Nita ;
Kaushik, Rucha ;
Parmar, Vani ;
Siddique, Shabina ;
Budrukkar, Ashwini ;
Mittra, Indraneel ;
Gupta, Sudeep .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (13) :1380-1388
[3]   Primary surgery versus no surgery in synchronous metastatic breast cancer: patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes of the prospective randomized multicenter ABCSG-28 Posytive Trial [J].
Bjelic-Radisic, V ;
Fitzal, F. ;
Knauer, M. ;
Steger, G. ;
Egle, D. ;
Greil, R. ;
Schrenk, P. ;
Balic, M. ;
Singer, Ch ;
Exner, R. ;
Soelkner, L. ;
Gnant, M. .
BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
[4]   Association of surgery with improved survival in stage IV breast cancer patients [J].
Blanchard, D. Kay ;
Shetty, Priya B. ;
Hilsenbeck, Susan G. ;
Elledge, Richard M. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (05) :732-738
[5]   Timing and Delays in Breast Cancer Evaluation and Treatment [J].
Bleicher, Richard J. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (10) :2829-2838
[6]   Systematic review and meta-analysis on the proportion of patients with breast cancer who develop bone metastases [J].
Body, Jean-Jacques ;
Quinn, Geoffrey ;
Talbot, Susan ;
Booth, Emma ;
Demonty, Gaston ;
Taylor, Aliki ;
Amelio, Justyna .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2017, 115 :67-80
[7]   Social determinants of breast cancer risk, stage, and survival [J].
Coughlin, Steven S. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 177 (03) :537-548
[8]   Treatment Delays in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Their Prognostic Implications [J].
Diaconescu, Razvan ;
Lafond, Chantal ;
Whittom, Renaud .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6 (07) :1254-1259
[9]   Surgical resection of the primary tumor is associated with increased long-term survival in patients with stage IV breast cancer after controlling for site of metastasis [J].
Fields, Ryan C. ;
Jeffe, Donna B. ;
Trinkaus, Kathryn ;
Zhang, Qin ;
Arthur, Carey ;
Aft, Rebecca ;
Dietz, Jill R. ;
Eberlein, Timothy J. ;
Gillanders, William E. ;
Margenthaler, Julie A. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (12) :3345-3351
[10]   Understanding the Bone in Cancer Metastasis [J].
Fornetti, Jaime ;
Welm, Alana L. ;
Stewart, Sheila A. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2018, 33 (12) :2099-2113