Selecting pesticides for inclusion in drinking water quality guidelines on the basis of detection probability and ranking

被引:16
作者
Narita, Kentaro [1 ]
Matsui, Yoshihiko [2 ]
Iwao, Kensuke [1 ]
Kamata, Motoyuki [3 ]
Matsushita, Taku [2 ]
Shirasaki, Nobutaka [2 ]
机构
[1] Hokkaido Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608628, Japan
[2] Hokkaido Univ, Fac Engn, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0608628, Japan
[3] Kanto Gakuin Univ, Coll Engn, Kanazawa Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2368501, Japan
关键词
Drinking water quality standards; Ranking; Risk assessment; Index; LEVEL RISK-ASSESSMENT; SCALE RUNOFF MODEL; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; SURFACE WATERS; RIVER WATER; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; POLLUTION; TENDENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2013.10.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Pesticides released into the environment may pose both ecological and human health risks. Governments set the regulations and guidelines for the allowable levels of active components of pesticides in various exposure sources, including drinking water. Several pesticide risk indicators have been developed using various methodologies, but such indicators are seldom used for the selection of pesticides to be included in national regulations and guidelines. The aim of the current study was to use risk indicators for the selection of pesticides to be included in regulations and guidelines. Twenty-four risk indicators were created, and a detection rate was defined to judge which indicators were the best for selection. The combination of two indicators (local sales of a pesticide for the purposes of either rice farming or other farming, divided by the guideline value and annual precipitation, and amended with the scores from the physical and chemical properties of the pesticide) gave the highest detection rates. In this case study, this procedure was used to evaluate 134 pesticides that are currently unregulated in the Japanese Drinking Water Quality Guidelines, from which 44 were selected as pesticides to be added to the primary group in the guidelines. The detection probability of the 44 pesticides was more than 72%. Among the 102 pesticides currently in the primary group, 17 were selected for withdrawal from the group. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 120
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, GUIDELINES DRINKING, V4th, P541
[2]  
Capri E, 2007, PESTICIDE RISK ASSES, P255
[3]  
Drinking Water Directive, 1998, OFF J EUR COMMUNIT L, VL330
[4]   Rating systems for pesticide risk classification on different ecosystems [J].
Finizio, A ;
Calliera, M ;
Vighi, M .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2001, 49 (03) :262-274
[5]  
FSC (Food Safety Commission), 2011, RISK ASS REP PEST
[6]   Screening of pesticides for environmental partitioning tendency [J].
Gramatica, P ;
Di Guardo, A .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2002, 47 (09) :947-956
[7]   Monitoring and modeling pesticide fate in surface waters at the catchment scale [J].
Holvoet, Katrijn M. A. ;
Seuntjens, Piet ;
Vanrolleghem, Peter A. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 209 (01) :53-64
[8]  
JPPA (Japan Plant Protection Association), 2008, PEST DIR 2007 2010
[9]   PestScreen:: A screening approach for scoring and ranking pesticides by their environmental and toxicological concern [J].
Juraske, Ronnie ;
Anton, Assumpcio ;
Castells, Francesc ;
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 33 (07) :886-893
[10]  
JWWA (Japan Water Works Association), 2009, STAT WAT SUPPL 2007, V90-93