Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis

被引:14
|
作者
Hovlid, Einar [1 ,2 ]
Braut, Geir Sverre [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Hannisdal, Einar [5 ]
Walshe, Kieran [6 ]
Bukve, Oddbjorn [1 ]
Flottorp, Signe [7 ]
Stensland, Per [2 ]
Frich, Jan C. [8 ]
机构
[1] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Inst Social Sci, Sogndal, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Global Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Bergen, Norway
[3] Stavanger Univ Hosp, Dept Res, Stavanger, Norway
[4] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Haugesund, Norway
[5] Cty Governor Oslo & Akershus, Dept Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[6] Univ Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Manchester, Lancs, England
[7] Folkehelseinstituttet, Oslo, Norway
[8] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, Oslo, Norway
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 08期
关键词
change management; clinical governance; health policy; quality in health care; organisational development; MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING; QUALITY-OF-CARE; HOSPITAL ACCREDITATION; SERVICE ACCREDITATION; CLINICAL INDICATORS; LOCAL HEALTH; IMPACT; IMPROVEMENT; RELIABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038850
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives External inspections are widely used to improve the quality of care. The effects of inspections remain unclear and little is known about how they may work. We conducted a narrative synthesis of research literature to identify mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspections. Methods We performed a literature search (1980-January 2020) to identify empirical studies addressing change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspection. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we performed a narrative synthesis to identify mediators of change. Results We included 95 studies. Accreditation was the most frequent type of inspection (n=68), followed by statutory inspections (n=19), and external peer review (n=9). Our findings suggest that the regulatory context in which the inspections take place affect how they are acted on by those being inspected. The way inspections are conducted seem to be critical for how the inspection findings are perceived and followed up. Inspections can engage and involve staff, facilitate leader engagement, improve communication and enable the creation of new networks for reflection on clinical practice. Inspections can contribute to creating an awareness of the inspected organisation's current practice and performance gaps, and a commitment to change. Moreover, they can contribute to facilitating the planning and implementation of change, as well as self-evaluation and the use of data to evaluate performance. Conclusions External inspections can affect different mediators of organisational change. The way and to what extent they do depend on a range of factors related to the outer setting, the way inspections are conducted and how they are perceived and acted on by the inspected organisation. To improve the quality of care, the organisational change processes need to involve and impact the way care is delivered to the patients.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Interventions delivered by primary or community healthcare professionals to support people living at home with dementia with activities of daily living: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Chester, Helen
    Bradbury, Barbara
    Santer, Miriam
    Morrison, Leanne
    Fader, Mandy
    Ward, Jane
    Manthorpe, Jill
    Murphy, Catherine
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [42] Living with Hepatitis C Virus: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Qualitative Literature
    Dowsett, Laura E.
    Coward, Stephanie
    Lorenzetti, Diane L.
    MacKean, Gail
    Clement, Fiona
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 2017
  • [43] A Systematic Review of Medical Equipment Reliability Assessment in Improving the Quality of Healthcare Services
    Zamzam, Aizat Hilmi
    Abdul Wahab, Ahmad Khairi
    Azizan, Muhammad Mokhzaini
    Satapathy, Suresh Chandra
    Lai, Khin Wee
    Hasikin, Khairunnisa
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [44] Early fluid bolus in adults with sepsis in the emergency department: a systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis
    Kabil, Gladis
    Frost, Steven A.
    Hatcher, Deborah
    Shetty, Amith
    Foster, Jann
    McNally, Stephen
    BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [45] Impact of sharing electronic health records with patients on the quality and safety of care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis protocol
    Neves, Ana Luisa
    Carter, Alexander W.
    Freise, Lisa
    Laranjo, Liliana
    Darzi, Ara
    Mayer, Erik K.
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (08):
  • [46] How do organisations implement research impact assessment (RIA) principles and good practice? A narrative review and exploratory study of four international research funding and administrative organisations
    Adam Kamenetzky
    Saba Hinrichs-Krapels
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 18
  • [47] How do organisations implement research impact assessment (RIA) principles and good practice? A narrative review and exploratory study of four international research funding and administrative organisations
    Kamenetzky, Adam
    Hinrichs-Krapels, Saba
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [48] The relationship between leadership styles and organisational innovation A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis
    Alblooshi, Mohamed
    Shamsuzzaman, Mohammad
    Haridy, Salah
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 24 (02) : 338 - 370
  • [49] Collaborative learning in practice: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the research evidence in nurse education
    Williamson, Graham R.
    Plowright, Hayley
    Kane, Adele
    Bunce, Jane
    Clarke, Danny
    Jamison, Caroline
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2020, 43
  • [50] Associations of workflow disruptions in the operating room with surgical outcomes: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Koch, Amelie
    Burns, Jacob
    Catchpole, Ken
    Weigl, Matthias
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2020, 29 (12) : 1033 - 1045