Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis

被引:14
|
作者
Hovlid, Einar [1 ,2 ]
Braut, Geir Sverre [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Hannisdal, Einar [5 ]
Walshe, Kieran [6 ]
Bukve, Oddbjorn [1 ]
Flottorp, Signe [7 ]
Stensland, Per [2 ]
Frich, Jan C. [8 ]
机构
[1] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Inst Social Sci, Sogndal, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Global Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Bergen, Norway
[3] Stavanger Univ Hosp, Dept Res, Stavanger, Norway
[4] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Haugesund, Norway
[5] Cty Governor Oslo & Akershus, Dept Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[6] Univ Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Manchester, Lancs, England
[7] Folkehelseinstituttet, Oslo, Norway
[8] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, Oslo, Norway
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 08期
关键词
change management; clinical governance; health policy; quality in health care; organisational development; MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING; QUALITY-OF-CARE; HOSPITAL ACCREDITATION; SERVICE ACCREDITATION; CLINICAL INDICATORS; LOCAL HEALTH; IMPACT; IMPROVEMENT; RELIABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038850
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives External inspections are widely used to improve the quality of care. The effects of inspections remain unclear and little is known about how they may work. We conducted a narrative synthesis of research literature to identify mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspections. Methods We performed a literature search (1980-January 2020) to identify empirical studies addressing change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspection. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we performed a narrative synthesis to identify mediators of change. Results We included 95 studies. Accreditation was the most frequent type of inspection (n=68), followed by statutory inspections (n=19), and external peer review (n=9). Our findings suggest that the regulatory context in which the inspections take place affect how they are acted on by those being inspected. The way inspections are conducted seem to be critical for how the inspection findings are perceived and followed up. Inspections can engage and involve staff, facilitate leader engagement, improve communication and enable the creation of new networks for reflection on clinical practice. Inspections can contribute to creating an awareness of the inspected organisation's current practice and performance gaps, and a commitment to change. Moreover, they can contribute to facilitating the planning and implementation of change, as well as self-evaluation and the use of data to evaluate performance. Conclusions External inspections can affect different mediators of organisational change. The way and to what extent they do depend on a range of factors related to the outer setting, the way inspections are conducted and how they are perceived and acted on by the inspected organisation. To improve the quality of care, the organisational change processes need to involve and impact the way care is delivered to the patients.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Social franchising in healthcare: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of implementation and outcomes
    Rahman, Md Hafizur
    Perkins, Janet E.
    Usmani, Nasimul Ghani
    Manna, Ridwana Maher
    Sajib, Md Refat Uz Zaman
    Akter, Ema
    Shomik, Mohammad Sohel
    Ahmed, Anisuddin
    El Arifeen, Shams
    Hossain, Aniqa Tasnim
    Rahman, Ahmed Ehsanur
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2025, 10 (02):
  • [2] Systematic review and narrative synthesis of computerized audit and feedback systems in healthcare
    Tsang, Jung Yin
    Peek, Niels
    Buchan, Iain
    van der Veer, Sabine N.
    Brown, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 29 (06) : 1106 - 1119
  • [3] Where are the inequalities in colorectal cancer care in a country with universal healthcare? A systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Pickwell-Smith, Benjamin Alexander
    Spencer, Katie
    Sadeghi, Mahboobeh Haji
    Greenley, Sarah
    Lind, Michael
    Macleod, Una
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [4] Medical leadership, a systematic narrative review: do hospitals and healthcare organisations perform better when led by doctors?
    Clay-Williams, Robyn
    Ludlow, Kristiana
    Testa, Luke
    Li, Zhicheng
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (09):
  • [5] What benefits do healthcare organisations receive from leadership and management development programmes? A systematic review of the evidence
    Seidman, Gabriel
    Pascal, Laurie
    McDonough, John
    BMJ LEADER, 2020, 4 (01) : 21 - 36
  • [6] Identification and Assessment of Breathlessness in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis
    Elliott-Button, Helene L.
    Johnson, Miriam J.
    Nwulu, Ugochinyere
    Clark, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2020, 59 (03) : 724 - +
  • [7] What methods are used to apply positive deviance within healthcare organisations? A systematic review
    Baxter, Ruth
    Taylor, Natalie
    Kellar, Ian
    Lawton, Rebecca
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2016, 25 (03) : 190 - 201
  • [8] The use of external change agents to promote quality improvement and organizational change in healthcare organizations: a systematic review
    Alagoz, Esra
    Chih, Ming-Yuan
    Hitchcock, Mary
    Brown, Randall
    Quanbeck, Andrew
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [10] Trainees' perspectives of assessment messages: a narrative systematic review
    Scarff, Catherine E.
    Bearman, Margaret
    Chiavaroli, Neville
    Trumble, Steve
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 53 (03) : 221 - 233