Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: Impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process

被引:164
作者
Bacenetti, Jacopo [1 ]
Negri, Marco [1 ]
Fiala, Marco [1 ]
Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Agr & Environm Sci Prod, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Aveiro, Dept Environm & Planning, CESAM, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
[3] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Sch Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
关键词
Biogas; Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission; Environmental sustainability; Climate Change; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; UTILIZATION PATHWAYS; METHANE EMISSIONS; RESOURCE DEMAND; ABATEMENT COSTS; COMBINED HEAT; POWER-PLANTS; AGRICULTURE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.058
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The possibility of limiting the global warming is strictly linked to the reduction of GHG emissions. Renewable energy both allows reducing emissions and permits to delay fossil fuel depletion. The anaerobic digestion of animal manure and energy crops is a promising way of reducing GHG emissions. In Italy agricultural biogas production was considerably increased; nowadays there are about 520 agricultural biogas plants. The increasing number of biogas plants, especially of those larger than 500 kW(e) (electrical power), involves a high consumption of energy crops, large transport distances of biomass and digestate and difficulties on thermal energy valorization. In this study the energetic (CED) and environmental (GHG emissions) profiles associated with the production of electricity derived from biogas have been identified. Three biogas plants located in Northern Italy have been analyzed. The study has been carried out considering a cradle-to-grave perspective and thus, special attention has been paid on the feedstock production and biogas production process. The influences on the results taking into account different plant sizes and feeding rate has been assessed in detail. Energy analysis was performed using the Cumulative Energy Demand method (CED). The climate change was calculated for a 100-year time frame based on GHG emissions indicated as CO2 equivalents (eq) and defined by the IPCC (2006). In comparison to the fossil reference system, the electricity production using biogas saves GHG emissions from 0.188 to 1.193 kg CO(2)eq per kWh(e). Electricity supply from biogas can also contribute to a considerable reduction of the use of fossil energy carriers (from -3.97 to 10.08 MJ(fossil), per kWh(e)). The electricity production from biogas has a big potential for energy savings and reduction of GHG emissions. Efficient utilization of the cogenerated heat can substantially improve the GHG balance of electricity production from biogas. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 551
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [41] Impact of uncertainties on greenhouse gas mitigation potential of biogas production from agricultural resources
    Meyer-Aurich, Andreas
    Schattauer, Alexander
    Hellebrand, Hans Juergen
    Klauss, Hilde
    Ploechl, Matthias
    Berg, Werner
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2012, 37 (01) : 277 - 284
  • [42] Cleaner production alternatives: Biomass utilisation options
    Mizsey, Peter
    Racz, Laszlo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (08) : 767 - 770
  • [43] Effect of biogas utilization and plant co-location on life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of cassava ethanol production
    Moriizumi, Yue
    Suksri, Piyawan
    Hondo, Hiroki
    Wake, Yoko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 37 : 326 - 334
  • [44] Assessment of optimal size of anaerobic co-digestion plants: An application to cattle farms in the province of Bari (Italy)
    Pantaleo, Antonio
    De Gennaro, Bernardo
    Shah, Nilay
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 20 : 57 - 70
  • [45] Life cycle assessment of biogas infrastructure options on a regional scale
    Patterson, Tim
    Esteves, Sandra
    Dinsdale, Richard
    Guwy, Alan
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (15) : 7313 - 7323
  • [46] Climate balance of biogas upgrading systems
    Pertl, A.
    Mostbauer, P.
    Obersteiner, G.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (01) : 92 - 99
  • [47] Piccinini S, 2012, BIOGAS SITUAZIONE PR
  • [48] Environmental impacts of biogas deployment - Part I: life cycle inventory for evaluation of production process emissions to air
    Poeschl, Martina
    Ward, Shane
    Owende, Philip
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 24 : 168 - 183
  • [49] Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways
    Poeschl, Martina
    Ward, Shane
    Owende, Philip
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2010, 87 (11) : 3305 - 3321
  • [50] Modeling the performance of the anaerobic phased, solids digester system for biogas energy production
    Rapport, Joshua L.
    Zhang, Ruihong
    Jenkins, Bryan M.
    Hartsough, Bruce R.
    Tomich, Thomas P.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (03) : 1263 - 1272