Prospective comparison of scar-related satisfaction and quality of life after laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: no differences from patients' point of view

被引:4
作者
Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry [1 ]
Belas, Olivier [1 ]
Saighi, Djillali [1 ]
Zerbib, Marc [1 ]
Peyromaure, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Paris Descartes Univ, Cochin Hosp, Dept Urol, F-75014 Paris, France
关键词
Radical prostatectomy; Laparoscopy; Scar; Quality of life;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-012-0862-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To evaluate and compare scar-related satisfaction in patients treated with open (ORP) versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). We prospectively included all patients treated with ORP and LRP in our department between March and June 2010. Scar-related outcomes were collected at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Three months after surgery, all patients filled up a questionnaire concerning their scar-related symptoms, scar self-consciousness and satisfaction. These variables were statistically compared between the two groups. A total of 101 patients were included for analysis. Of them, 48, 49 and 4 were treated with LRP, ORP and LRP converted to ORP, respectively. Age distribution was not statistically different between groups. Postoperatively, 5 patients experienced skin infection on their scar site, 2 in the ORP and 3 in the LRP group. The most frequently reported symptom was scar itching, that was more frequent after LRP, although difference was not significant (33 vs. 19 %, p = 0.2). According to patient scar-related consciousness, satisfaction and impact on quality of life, no differences were reported between groups. Impact on quality of life was insignificant in 27 (55 %) versus 21 (44 %) patients after ORP and LRP, respectively (p = 0.3). With an overall low impact on satisfaction and quality of life, scars gendered by LRP and ORP were not different from patients' point of view. In patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, the cosmetic aspect of scars does not seem to be a concern.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 393
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   The hidden cost of skin scars: quality of life after skin scarring [J].
Brown, B. C. ;
McKenna, S. P. ;
Siddhi, K. ;
McGrouther, D. A. ;
Bayat, A. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2008, 61 (09) :1049-1058
[2]   The Patient-Reported Impact of Scars Measure: Development and Validation [J].
Brown, Benjamin C. ;
McKenna, Stephen P. ;
Solomon, Mattea ;
Wilburn, Jeanette ;
McGrouther, Duncan A. ;
Bayat, Ardeshir .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 125 (05) :1439-1449
[3]   The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire: A Reliable and Valid Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure for Linear Scars [J].
Durani, Piyush ;
McGrouther, Duncan A. ;
Ferguson, Mark W. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 123 (05) :1481-1489
[4]   Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative Studies [J].
Ficarra, Vincenzo ;
Novara, Giacomo ;
Artibani, Walter ;
Cestari, Andrea ;
Galfano, Antonio ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio ;
Guillonneau, Bertrand ;
Menon, Mani ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Patel, Vipul ;
Rassweiler, Jens ;
Van Poppel, Hendrik .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (05) :1037-1063
[5]   Intra- and peri-operative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Results from a prospective, randomised, single-surgeon study [J].
Guazzoni, Giorgio ;
Cestari, Andrea ;
Naspro, Richard ;
Riva, Matteo ;
Centemero, Antonia ;
Zanoni, Matteo ;
Rigatti, Lorenzo ;
Rigatti, Patrizio .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (01) :98-104
[6]   Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter? [J].
Herrmann, T. R. ;
Rabenalt, R. ;
Stolzenburg, J. U. ;
Liatsikos, E. N. ;
Imkamp, F. ;
Tezval, H. ;
Gross, A. J. ;
Jonas, U. ;
Burchardt, M. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 25 (02) :149-160
[7]   Prospective non-randomized evaluation of four mediators of the systemic response after extraperitoneal laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy [J].
Jurczok, Andreas ;
Zacharias, Mario ;
Wagner, Sigrid ;
Hamza, Amir ;
Fornara, Paolo .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 99 (06) :1461-1466
[8]   Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques [J].
Krambeck, Amy E. ;
DiMarco, David S. ;
Rangel, Laureano J. ;
Bergstralh, Eric J. ;
Myers, Robert P. ;
Blute, Michael L. ;
Gettman, Matthew T. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 (04) :448-453
[9]   Changes in quality of life in first year after radical prostatectomy by retropubic, laparoscopic, and perineal approach: Multi-institutional longitudinal study in Japan [J].
Namiki, S ;
Egawa, S ;
Terachi, T ;
Matsubara, A ;
Igawa, M ;
Terai, A ;
Tochigi, T ;
Ioritani, N ;
Saito, S ;
Arai, Y .
UROLOGY, 2006, 67 (02) :321-327
[10]   Recovery of quality of life in year after laparoscopic or retropubic radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional longitudinal study [J].
Namiki, S ;
Egawa, S ;
Baba, S ;
Terachi, T ;
Usui, Y ;
Terai, A ;
Tochigi, T ;
Kuwahara, M ;
Ioritani, N ;
Arai, Y .
UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (03) :517-523