The effect of rib and lung heterogeneities on the computed dose to lung in Ir-192 High-Dose-Rate breast brachytherapy: Monte Carlo versus a treatment planning system

被引:2
|
作者
Yazdi, Hossein Salehi [3 ]
Shamsaei, Mojtaba [3 ]
Jaberi, Ramin [2 ]
Shabani, Hamid Reza [1 ]
Allahverdi, Mahmoud [1 ]
Vaezzadeh, Seyed Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Imam Khomeini Hosp, Inst Canc, Dept Radiotherapy Oncol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Nucl Engn & Phys, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Breast cancer; brachytherapy; heterogeneity; MCNPX; treatment planning system; DOSIMETRIC PARAMETERS; PROSTATE-CANCER; INHOMOGENEITIES; POSITION; MODEL;
D O I
10.4103/0973-1482.103519
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: This study investigates to what extent the dose received by lungs from a commercially available treatment planning system, Ir-192 high-dose-rate (HDR), in breast brachytherapy, is accurate, with the emphasis on tissue heterogeneities, and taking into account the presence of ribs, in dose delivery to the lung. Materials and Methods: A computed tomography (CT) scan of a breast was acquired and transferred to the 3-D treatment planning system and was also used to construct a patient-equivalent phantom. An implant involving 13 plastic catheters and 383 programmed source dwell positions were simulated, using the Monte Carlo N-Particle eXtended (MCNPX) code. The Monte Carlo calculations were compared with the corresponding commercial treatment planning system (TPS) in the form of percentage isodose and cumulative dose-volume histogram (DVH) in the breast, lungs, and ribs. Results: The comparison of the Monte Carlo results and the TPS calculations showed that a percentage of isodose greater than 75 in the breast, which was located rather close to the implant or away from the breast curvature surface and lung boundary, were in good agreement. TPS calculations overestimated the dose to the lung for lower isodose contours that were lying near the breast surface and the boundary of breast and lung and were relatively away from the implant. Conclusions: Taking into account the ribs and entering the actual data for breasts, ribs, and lungs, revealed an average overestimation of the dose by a factor of 8 in the lung for TPS calculations. Therefore, the accuracy of the TPS results may be limited to regions near the implants where the treatment is planned, and is a more conservative approach for regions at boundaries with curvatures or tissues with a different material than that in the breast.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 398
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THUBrachy: fast Monte Carlo dose calculation tool accelerated by heterogeneous hardware for high-dose-rate brachytherapy
    Hu, An-Kang
    Qiu, Rui
    Liu, Huan
    Wu, Zhen
    Li, Chun-Yan
    Zhang, Hui
    Li, Jun-Li
    Yang, Rui-Jie
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUES, 2021, 32 (03)
  • [32] In vivo thermoluminescence dosimetry dose verification of transperineal 192Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy using CT-based planning for the treatment of prostate cancer
    Anagnostopoulos, G
    Baltas, D
    Geretschlaeger, A
    Martin, T
    Papagiannis, P
    Tselis, N
    Zamboglou, N
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (04): : 1183 - 1191
  • [33] The effects of bismuth oxide nanoparticles and cisplatin on MCF-7 breast cancer cells irradiated with Ir-192 High Dose Rate brachytherapy
    Sisin, Noor Nabilah Talik
    Razak, Khairunisak Abdul
    Mat, Nor Fazila Che
    Abdullah, Reduan
    Ab Rashid, Raizulnasuha
    Zainudin, Nur Hamizah Mohd
    Anuar, Muhammad Afiq Khairil
    Jamil, Amirah
    Geso, Moshi
    Rahman, Wan Nordiana
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 15 (01) : 159 - 171
  • [34] Isolating the impact of tissue heterogeneities in high dose rate brachytherapy treatment of the breast
    Faucher, Jules
    Turgeon, Vincent
    Bahoric, Boris
    Enger, Shirin A.
    Watson, Peter G. F.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2025, 33
  • [35] Monte Carlo simulation to assess free space and end-weld thickness variation effects on dose rate for a new Ir-192 brachytherapy source
    Angelocci, Lucas Verdi
    de Souza, Carla Daruich
    Pantelis, Evaggelos
    Nogueira, Beatriz Ribeiro
    Zeituni, Carlos Alberto
    Chueri Martins Rostelato, Maria Elisa
    APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2021, 173
  • [36] The effect of finite patient dimensions and tissue inhomogeneities on dosimetry planning of 192Ir HDR breast brachytherapy:: A Monte Carlo dose verification study
    Pantelis, E
    Papagiannis, P
    Karaiskos, P
    Angelopoulos, A
    Anagnostopoulos, G
    Baltas, D
    Zamboglou, N
    Sakelliou, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (05): : 1596 - 1602
  • [37] Suitability of microDiamond detectors for the determination of absorbed dose to water around high-dose-rate 192Ir brachytherapy sources
    Kaveckyte, Vaiva
    Malusek, Alexandr
    Benmakhlouf, Hamza
    Carlsson, Gudrun Alm
    Tedgren, Asa Carlsson
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (01) : 429 - 437
  • [38] Development of a phantom to validate high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning systems with heterogeneous algorithms
    Moura, Eduardo S.
    Micka, John A.
    Hammer, Cliff G.
    Culberson, Wesley S.
    DeWerd, Larry A.
    Rostelato, Maria Elisa C. M.
    Zeituni, Carlos A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (04) : 1566 - 1574
  • [39] Dosimetric effect of external beam planning preceding combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy of the prostate
    Martin, Jarad M.
    Brett, Richard
    Blyth, Jemma
    Morrison, Stewart
    Bryant, Daniel
    Plank, Ashley
    Cheuk, Robyn
    Fay, Michael
    Dickie, Graeme
    Yaxley, John
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2011, 10 (06) : 474 - 478
  • [40] First experience of 192Ir source stuck event during high-dose-rate brachytherapy in Japan
    Kumagai, Shinobu
    Arai, Norikazu
    Takata, Takeshi
    Kon, Daisuke
    Saitoh, Toshiya
    Oba, Hiroshi
    Furui, Shigeru
    Kotoku, Jun'ichi
    Shiraishi, Kenshiro
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2020, 12 (01) : 53 - 60