Machine learning for the identification of clinically significant prostate cancer on MRI: a meta-analysis

被引:74
作者
Cuocolo, Renato [1 ]
Cipullo, Maria Brunella [1 ]
Stanzione, Arnaldo [1 ]
Romeo, Valeria [1 ]
Green, Roberta [1 ]
Cantoni, Valeria [1 ]
Ponsiglione, Andrea [1 ]
Ugga, Lorenzo [1 ]
Imbriaco, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Adv Biomed Sci, Via Pansini 5, I-80131 Naples, Italy
关键词
Meta-analysis; Machine learning; Prostatic neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; CLASSIFICATION; RADIOMICS; DIAGNOSIS; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-020-07027-w
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and perform a meta-analysis of machine learning (ML) diagnostic accuracy studies focused on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) identification on MRI. Methods Multiple medical databases were systematically searched for studies on ML applications in csPCa identification up to July 31, 2019. Two reviewers screened all papers independently for eligibility. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) was pooled to quantify predictive accuracy. A random-effects model estimated overall effect size while statistical heterogeneity was assessed with theI(2)value. A funnel plot was used to investigate publication bias. Subgroup analyses were performed based on reference standard (biopsy or radical prostatectomy) and ML type (deep and non-deep). Results After the final revision, 12 studies were included in the analysis. Statistical heterogeneity was high both in overall and in subgroup analyses. The overall pooled AUC for ML in csPCa identification was 0.86, with 0.81-0.91 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). The biopsy subgroup (n = 9) had a pooled AUC of 0.85 (95%CI = 0.79-0.91) while the radical prostatectomy one (n = 3) of 0.88 (95%CI = 0.76-0.99). Deep learning ML (n = 4) had a 0.78 AUC (95%CI = 0.69-0.86) while the remaining 8 had AUC = 0.90 (95%CI = 0.85-0.94). Conclusions ML pipelines using prostate MRI to identify csPCa showed good accuracy and should be further investigated, possibly with better standardisation in design and reporting of results.
引用
收藏
页码:6877 / 6887
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Computer-aided grading of prostate cancer from MRI images using Convolutional Neural Networks
    Abraham, Bejoy
    Nair, Madhu S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 36 (03) : 2015 - 2024
  • [2] From Handcrafted to Deep-Learning-Based Cancer Radiomics Challenges and opportunities
    Afshar, Parnian
    Mohammadi, Arash
    Plataniotis, Konstantinos N.
    Oikonomou, Anastasia
    Benali, Habib
    [J]. IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2019, 36 (04) : 132 - 160
  • [3] Biparametric vs multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of prostate cancer in treatment-naive patients: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alabousi, Mostafa
    Salameh, Jean-Paul
    Gusenbauer, Kaela
    Samoilov, Lucy
    Jafri, Ali
    Yu, Hang
    Alabousi, Abdullah
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (02) : 209 - 220
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, P MIC 2015 11 METAHE
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2019, EAU ANN C BARC
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2017, C BIOM ENG ANG MED P
  • [7] Machine learning classifiers can predict Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer with greater accuracy than experienced radiologists
    Antonelli, Michela
    Johnston, Edward W.
    Dikaios, Nikolaos
    Cheung, King K.
    Sidhu, Harbir S.
    Appayya, Mrishta B.
    Giganti, Francesco
    Simmons, Lucy A. M.
    Freeman, Alex
    Allen, Clare
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Atkinson, David
    Ourselin, Sebastien
    Punwani, Shonit
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (09) : 4754 - 4764
  • [8] A Systematic Review of the Existing Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Literature and Subset Meta-Analysis of PI-RADSv2 Categories Stratified by Gleason Scores
    Barkovich, Emil Jernstedt
    Shankar, Prasad R.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (04) : 847 - 854
  • [9] Assessing Radiology Research on Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Guide for Authors, Reviewers, and Readers-From the Radiology Editorial Board
    Bluemke, David A.
    Moy, Linda
    Bredella, Miriam A.
    Ertl-Wagner, Birgit B.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Goh, Vicky J.
    Halpern, Elkan F.
    Hess, Christopher P.
    Schiebler, Mark L.
    Weiss, Clifford R.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2020, 294 (03) : 487 - 489
  • [10] Radiomic Machine Learning for Characterization of Prostate Lesions with MRI: Comparison to ADC Values
    Bonekamp, David
    Kohl, Simon
    Wiesenfarth, Manuel
    Schelb, Patrick
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    Goetz, Michael
    Kickingereder, Philipp
    Yaqubi, Kaneschka
    Hitthaler, Bertram
    Gaehlert, Nils
    Kuder, Tristan Anselm
    Deister, Fenja
    Freitag, Martin
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Maier-Hein, Klaus H.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (01) : 128 - 137