The role of intuition in Kant's philosophy of mathematics has often been misunderstood. The present essay aims to remedy this misapprehension by offering an in-depth analysis of the most crucial passages of the Critique of Pure Reason for Kant's philosophy of mathematics. First, I argue that the role Kant ascribes to intuition in mathematical practice should not be interpreted as a remedy for the defects of Aristotelian logic, as has been argued by several authors. Instead, it should be understood as a necessary condition for the objective validity of mathematics. Second, I argue that the often-neglected `Axioms of Intuition' should be given more attention in Kant scholarship since they constitute Kant's proof that mathematics indeed has objective validity. In order to explain the `Axioms of Intuition,' a detour is taken through the so- called `subjective deduction' in which Kant unravels his theory of the threefold synthesis.