Community Sharing of Spare Network Capacity

被引:0
作者
Dimogerontakis, Emmanouil [1 ,3 ]
Meseguer, Roc [1 ]
Navarro, Leandro [1 ]
Ochoa, Sergio F. [2 ]
Veiga, Luis [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Chile, Santiago, Chile
[3] INESC ID Lisboa, Tecn Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 IEEE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORKING, SENSING AND CONTROL (ICNSC 2017) | 2017年
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Internet access sharing; community network; user experience; proxy service;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In several community scenarios, people share benevolently their spare broadband Internet access connectivity with other people who cannot afford it. Although laudable, this sharing process can negatively affect the service received by the primary users, thus jeopardizing the continuity of this community service. In this paper we propose the use of a gateway that separates the traffic of the primary users from that of the secondary users, the beneficiaries of this sharing. We analyze the impact and behavior of several mechanisms for using this gateway, to determine how to maximize network utilization, use of the excess network capacity, and minimize the impact on the primary traffic. As a result we present a set of lessons learned and recommendations. Particularly, some strategies that use tunneling for managing the primary and secondary traffic achieve the best performance isolation for the primary user, while the secondary user obtains the spare capacity equivalent to non-differentiated best effort, with a limited penalty (around 20%). Combined with complementary queueing techniques (instead of FIFO), other important flows for the user experience (such as DNS or ICMP) can be practically unaffected.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 304
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Software-defined wireless mesh networks for internet access sharing
    Abujoda, Ahmed
    Dietrich, David
    Papadimitriou, Panagiotis
    Sathiaseelan, Arjuna
    [J]. COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2015, 93 : 359 - 372
  • [2] Braem B., 2015, COMPUTING DEV ACM DE, P159
  • [3] Cerf V, 2002, 3271 RFC
  • [4] Dimogerontakis E., 2017, IFIP IEEE INT S INT, P1
  • [5] Optimizing cost and performance for multihoming
    Goldenberg, DK
    Qiu, LL
    Xie, HY
    Yang, YR
    Zhang, Y
    [J]. ACM SIGCOMM COMPUTER COMMUNICATION REVIEW, 2004, 34 (04) : 79 - 92
  • [6] Fighting the bufferbloat: On the coexistence of AQM and low priority congestion control
    Gong, Y.
    Rossi, D.
    Testa, C.
    Valenti, S.
    Taeht, M. D.
    [J]. COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2014, 65 : 255 - 267
  • [7] Khare R., 2011, 6297 RFC
  • [8] TCP-LP: Low-priority service via end-point congestion control
    Kuzmanovic, Aleksandar
    Knightly, Edward W.
    [J]. IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 2006, 14 (04) : 739 - 752
  • [9] Laoutaris N, 2009, PERF E R SI, V37, P229
  • [10] Low S., 2000, TECH REP