Contiguity of proactive and reactive inhibitory brain areas: a cognitive model based on ALE meta-analyses

被引:46
作者
Gavazzi, Gioele [1 ]
Giovannelli, Fabio [2 ]
Curro, Tommaso [2 ]
Mascalchi, Mario [3 ]
Viggiano, Maria Pia [2 ]
机构
[1] SDN, IRCCS, Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Florence, Dept Neurosci Psychol Drug Res Child Hlth, Florence, Italy
[3] Univ Florence, Dept Expt & Clin Biomed Sci, Florence, Italy
关键词
Proactive inhibition; Cognitive control; Meta-analysis; Right inferior frontal Gyrus; Right middle frontal Gyrus; ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; INFERIOR FRONTAL-CORTEX; RESPONSE-INHIBITION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; ACTIVATION; STOP; CONNECTIVITY; MECHANISMS; ATTENTION; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1007/s11682-020-00369-5
中图分类号
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100207 ;
摘要
Cognitive control is a critical feature in adapting our behavior to environmental and internal demands with two types of inhibition having been identified, namely the proactive and the reactive. Aiming to shed light on their respective neural correlates, we decided to focus on the cerebral activity before or after presentation of the target demanding a subject's stop as a way to separate the proactive from the reactive components associated with the tasks. Accordingly, we performed three Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses of fMRI studies exploring proactive and reactive inhibitory phases of cognitive control. For this purpose, we searched for fMRI studies investigating brain activity preceding or following target stimuli. Eight studies (291 subjects, 101 foci) were identified for the proactive analysis. Five of these studies and those previously analyzed by others (348 subjects, 199 foci) were meta-analyzed to explore the neural correlates of reactive inhibition. Overall, our results showed different networks for the two inhibitory components. Notably, we observed a contiguity between areas in the right inferior frontal gyrus pertaining to proactive inhibition and in the right middle frontal gyrus regarding reactive inhibition. These neural correlates allow proposal of a new comprehensive model of cognitive control.
引用
收藏
页码:2199 / 2214
页数:16
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] inhibitrion and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on
    Aron, Adam R.
    Robbins, Trevor W.
    Poldrack, Russell A.
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (04) : 177 - 185
  • [2] From Reactive to Proactive and Selective Control: Developing a Richer Model for Stopping Inappropriate Responses
    Aron, Adam R.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 69 (12) : E55 - E68
  • [3] Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans
    Aron, AR
    Fletcher, PC
    Bullmore, ET
    Sahakian, BJ
    Robbins, TW
    [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 6 (02) : 115 - 116
  • [4] Inhibition and impulsivity: Behavioral and neural basis of response control
    Bari, Andrea
    Robbins, Trevor W.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2013, 108 : 44 - 79
  • [5] Should I Stop or Should I Go? The Role of Associations and Expectancies
    Best, Maisy
    Lawrence, Natalia S.
    Logan, Gordon D.
    McLaren, Ian P. L.
    Verbruggen, Frederick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2016, 42 (01) : 115 - 137
  • [6] Contrasting neural effects of aging on proactive and reactive response inhibition
    Bloemendaal, Mirjam
    Zandbelt, Bram
    Wegman, Joost
    de Rest, Ondine van
    Cools, Roshan
    Aarts, Esther
    [J]. NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2016, 46 : 96 - 106
  • [7] Borenstein M., 2009, Introduction to meta-analysis, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470743386
  • [8] Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update
    Botvinick, Matthew M.
    Cohen, Jonathan D.
    Carter, Cameron S.
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (12) : 539 - 546
  • [9] Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
    Botvinick, MM
    Braver, TS
    Barch, DM
    Carter, CS
    Cohen, JD
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) : 624 - 652
  • [10] The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework
    Braver, Todd S.
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (02) : 106 - 113