Convergence between DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Diagnostic Models for Personality Disorder: Evaluation of Strategies for Establishing Diagnostic Thresholds

被引:70
作者
Morey, Leslie C. [1 ]
Skodol, Andrew E. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
personality disorders; DSM-5; psychiatric classification; nosology; diagnostic thresholds; BORDERLINE PERSONALITY; PSYCHIATRIC OUTPATIENTS; ALTERNATIVE MODELS; ASSESSING LEVEL; 5-FACTOR MODEL; UNITED-STATES; FOLLOW-UP; III-R; TRAITS; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1097/01.pra.0000430502.78833.06
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The Personality and Personality Disorders Work Group for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) recommended substantial revisions to the personality disorders (PDs) section of DSM-IV-TR, proposing a hybrid categorical-dimensional model that represented PDs as combinations of core personality dysfunctions and various configurations of maladaptive personality traits. Although the DSM-5 Task Force endorsed the proposal, the Board of Trustees of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) did not, placing the Work Group's model in DSM-5 Section III ("Emerging Measures and Models") with other concepts thought to be in need of additional research. This paper documents the impact of using this alternative model in a national sample of 337 patients as described by clinicians familiar with their cases. In particular, the analyses focus on alternative strategies considered by the Work Group for deriving decision rules, or diagnostic thresholds, with which to assign categorical diagnoses. Results demonstrate that diagnostic rules could be derived that yielded appreciable correspondence between DSM-IV-TR and proposed DSM-5 PD diagnoses-correspondence greater than that observed in the transition between DSM-III and DSM-III-R PDs. The approach also represents the most comprehensive attempt to date to provide conceptual and empirical justification for diagnostic thresholds utilized within the DSM PDs. (Journal of Psychiatric Practice 2013;19:179-193)
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 193
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, DSM 3
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[3]   PERSONALITY DISORDER DIAGNOSTIC THRESHOLDS CORRESPOND TO DIFFERENT LEVELS OF LATENT PATHOLOGY [J].
Balsis, Steve ;
Lowmaster, Sara ;
Cooper, Luke D. ;
Benge, Jared F. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2011, 25 (01) :115-127
[4]   Toward a Model for Assessing Level of Personality Functioning in DSM-5, Part I: A Review of Theory and Methods [J].
Bender, Donna S. ;
Morey, Leslie C. ;
Skodol, Andrew E. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2011, 93 (04) :332-346
[5]   Opinions of personality disorder experts regarding the DSM-IV personality disorders classification system [J].
Bernstein, David P. ;
Iscan, Cuneyt ;
Maser, Jack .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2007, 21 (05) :536-551
[6]   THE EFFECTS OF CHANGING AXIS-II DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA [J].
BLASHFIELD, R ;
BLUM, N ;
PFOHL, B .
COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 1992, 33 (04) :245-252
[7]   Personality disorder assessment: The challenge of construct validity [J].
Clark, LA ;
Livesley, WJ ;
Morey, LC .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 1997, 11 (03) :205-231
[8]   Clinical utility: A prerequisite for the adoption of a dimensional approach in DSM [J].
First, MB .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 114 (04) :560-564
[9]   CATEGORICAL AND DIMENSIONAL SYSTEMS OF PERSONALITY DIAGNOSIS - A COMPARISON [J].
FRANCES, A .
COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 1982, 23 (06) :516-527
[10]  
FRANCES A, 1980, AM J PSYCHIAT, V137, P1050