Comparison of seismic assessment procedures for masonry arch bridges

被引:95
作者
Pela, Luca [1 ]
Aprile, Alessandra [2 ]
Benedetti, Andrea [3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Catalonia UPC, DEC Dept, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[2] Univ Ferrara, ENDIF Dept, I-44100 Ferrara, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, DICAM Dept, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
关键词
Masonry; Arch bridge; Pushover analysis; Nonlinear dynamic analysis; Control node; Earthquake response; STATIC PUSHOVER; BUILDINGS; COLLAPSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.046
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This work delves into the seismic assessment of masonry bridges through a detailed analysis of an existing triple-arched bridge. Firstly, the effectiveness of the nonlinear static analysis is evaluated by means of a comparison with a comprehensive set of 84 nonlinear dynamic analyses. Secondly, the choice of the control node on the finite element structural model is investigated, in order to understand its influence on the prediction of seismic capacity. Although the node located at the top level is usually considered to characterize the force-displacement response of common structures, such a choice is not suitable for the considered case-study. The node located at the level of the bridge's centre of mass proves to be a better choice since it ensures a more reliable estimation of the seismic capacity. The critical discussion of the numerical analyses results gives useful indications towards an improved procedure for the seismic assessment of the considered structural typology. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 394
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Seismic vulnerability assessment of RC deck-stiffened arch bridges [J].
Crisci, Giovanni ;
Gentile, Roberto ;
Ceroni, Francesca ;
Galasso, Carmine ;
Lignola, Gian Piero .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2024, 317
[12]   Modal properties variation and collapse assessment of masonry arch bridges under scour action [J].
Scozzese, Fabrizio ;
Ragni, Laura ;
Tubaldi, Enrico ;
Gara, Fabrizio .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 199
[13]   Transverse prestressing and reinforced concrete as the key to restoration of masonry arch bridges [J].
Klusacek, Ladislav ;
Necas, Radim ;
Pozar, Michal ;
Peknik, Robin ;
Svoboda, Adam .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 245
[14]   Seismic Assessment of Masonry oGaioleiroo Buildings in Lisbon, Portugal [J].
Mendes, Nuno ;
Lourenco, Paulo B. .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2010, 14 (01) :80-101
[15]   Seismic capacity of masonry arches with irregular abutments and arch thickness [J].
Zampieri, Paolo ;
Simoncello, Nicole ;
Pellegrino, Carlo .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2019, 201 :786-806
[16]   Seismic analysis of a masonry arch bridge using multiple methodologies [J].
Gonen, Semih ;
Soyoz, Serdar .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 226
[17]   The effect of arch geometry on the structural behavior of masonry bridges [J].
Altunisik, Ahmet C. ;
Kanbur, Burcu ;
Genc, Ali F. .
SMART STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS, 2015, 16 (06) :1069-1089
[18]   Kinematic approach for scour analysis of masonry arch bridges [J].
George, Jofin ;
Menon, Arun .
ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2022, 141
[19]   Seismic assessment of rocking masonry structures [J].
Lagomarsino, Sergio .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2015, 13 (01) :97-128
[20]   Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Stone Arch Bridges by Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis Using Discrete Element Method [J].
Mehrbod, Amirhossein ;
Behnamfar, Farhad ;
Aziminejad, Armin ;
Hashemol-Hosseini, Hamid .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2023, 17 (11) :1791-1812