Fine-tuning of algorithms using fractional experimental designs and local search

被引:243
作者
Adenso-Díaz, B
Laguna, M
机构
[1] Univ Oviedo, Escuela Super Ingenieros Ind, Gijon 33204, Spain
[2] Univ Colorado, Leeds Sch Business, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1287/opre.1050.0243
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Researchers and practitioners frequently spend more time fine-tuning algorithms than designing and implementing them. This is particularly true when developing heuristics and metaheuristics, where the "right" choice of values for search parameters has a considerable effect on the performance of the procedure. When testing metaheuristics, performance typically is measured considering both the quality of the solutions obtained and the time needed to find them. In this paper, we describe the development of CALIBRA, a procedure that attempts to find the best values for up to five search parameters associated with a procedure under study. Because CALIBRA uses Taguchi's fractional factorial experimental designs coupled with a local search procedure, the best values found are not guaranteed to be optimal. We test CALIBRA on six existing heuristic-based procedures. These experiments show that CALIBRA is able to find parameter values that either match or improve the performance of the procedures resulting from using the parameter values suggested by their developers. The latest version of CALIBRA can be downloaded for free from the website that appears in the online supplement of this paper at http://or.pubs.informs.org/Pages.collect.html.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 114
页数:16
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   RESTRICTED NEIGHBORHOOD IN THE TABU SEARCH FOR THE FLOWSHOP PROBLEM [J].
ADENSO-DIAZ, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1992, 62 (01) :27-37
[2]   An SA/TS mixture algorithm for the scheduling tardiness problem [J].
Adenso-Diaz, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 88 (03) :516-524
[3]  
ADENSODIAZ B, 2001, INT J OPER QUANT MAN, V7, P105
[4]  
Amini M. M., 1993, ORSA Journal on Computing, V5, P395, DOI 10.1287/ijoc.5.4.395
[5]   A RIGOROUS COMPUTATIONAL COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION METHODS FOR THE GENERALIZED ASSIGNMENT PROBLEM [J].
AMINI, MM ;
RACER, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1994, 40 (07) :868-890
[6]  
Anderson C. A., 1993, Annals of Operations Research, V41, P301
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1987, SYSTEM EXPT DESIGN E
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1987, SIMULATED ANNEALING
[9]  
Barr R. S., 1995, Journal of Heuristics, V1, P9, DOI 10.1007/BF02430363
[10]   A HEURISTIC FOR EUCLIDEAN AND RECTILINEAR STEINER PROBLEMS [J].
BEASLEY, JE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1992, 58 (02) :284-292