Speech with maxillary implant prostheses: Ratings of articulation

被引:44
作者
Heydecke, G
McFarland, DH
Feine, JS
Lund, JP
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Fac Dent, Montreal, PQ H3A 2B2, Canada
[2] Univ Freiburg, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Montreal, Ecole Orthophonie & Audiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat & Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Dept Oncol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Montreal, Ctr Rech Sci & Neurol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
dental implants; overdentures; clinical trial; maxillary prostheses; speech;
D O I
10.1177/154405910408300310
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Speech is often perturbed after placement of maxillary implant-retained prostheses. We tested the hypothesis that the rate of speech errors varies with prosthetic design. Thirty edentulous subjects with mandibular implant prostheses entered two within-subject crossover trials. Subjects wore maxillary fixed prostheses and removable long-bar overdentures (Trial 1), or overdentures with and without palates (Trial 2). Test words from a French language speech battery were recorded after each prosthesis had been worn for two months. The percentages of stops, fricatives, and vowels correctly perceived by lay judges were calculated. Subjects produced a significantly higher percentage of sounds correctly with overdentures than with fixed prostheses. Between-treatment differences were significant for stops and fricatives (p < 0.01), but not for vowels. There were no significant differences in error rates between the two overdentures. In conclusion, maxillary implant overdentures with and without palates enable patients to produce more intelligible speech than fixed prostheses.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 240
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1958, Planning of Experiments
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1982, CLIN PHONETICS
[3]   Measuring patient satisfaction with mandibular prostheses [J].
Awad, MA ;
Feine, JS .
COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 26 (06) :400-405
[4]   The development of speech adaptation to an artificial palate [J].
Baum, SR ;
McFarland, DH .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1997, 102 (04) :2353-2359
[5]  
*CTR HOSP COT DES, 1986, POT MONTR TOUL EX LI
[6]   Within-subject comparison of maxillary long-bar implant-retained prostheses with and without palatal coverage:: patient-based outcomes [J].
de Albuquerque, RF ;
Lund, JP ;
Tang, L ;
Larivée, J ;
de Grandmont, P ;
Gauthier, G ;
Feine, JS .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2000, 11 (06) :555-565
[7]   WITHIN-SUBJECT COMPARISONS OF IMPLANT-SUPPORTED MANDIBULAR PROSTHESES - PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION [J].
DEGRANDMONT, P ;
FEINE, JS ;
TACHE, R ;
BOUDRIAS, P ;
DONOHUE, WB ;
TANGUAY, R ;
LUND, JP .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 (05) :1096-1104
[8]   COMPENSATING FOR A BITE BLOCK IN (S) AND (T) PRODUCTION - PALATOGRAPHIC, ACOUSTIC, AND PERCEPTUAL DATA [J].
FLEGE, JE ;
FLETCHER, SG ;
HOMIEDAN, A .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1988, 83 (01) :212-228
[9]   THE EFFECTS OF PRESENTATION OF NOISE AND DENTAL APPLIANCES ON SPEECH [J].
GARBER, SR ;
SPEIDEL, TM ;
SIEGEL, GM ;
MILLER, E ;
GLASS, L .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1980, 23 (04) :838-852
[10]  
Hamlet S., 1976, J PHONETICS, V3, P199, DOI [10.1016/s0095-4470, DOI 10.1016/S0095-4470]