Dynamics of virus excretion via different routes in pigs experimentally infected with classical swine fever virus strains of high, moderate or low virulence

被引:49
作者
Weesendorp, Eefke [1 ,2 ]
Stegeman, Arian [2 ]
Loeffen, Willie
机构
[1] Cent Vet Inst Wageningen UR, Dept Virol, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Fac Vet Med, Dept Farm Anim Hlth, NL-3584 CL Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Excretion routes; Classical swine fever virus; Chronic infection; Transmission; HOG-CHOLERA VIRUS; SUBUNIT VACCINE; TRANSMISSION; PATHOGENESIS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; NETHERLANDS; ANTIBODIES; EFFICACY; SIGNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.06.008
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Classical swine fever virus (CSFV) is transmitted via secretions and excretions of infected pigs. The efficiency and speed of the transmission depends oil a multitude of parameters, like quantities Of Virus excreted by infected Pigs. ThiS study provides quantitative data oil excretion of CSFV over time front pigs infected with a highly, moderately or low virulent strain. For each strain. five individually housed pigs were infected. Virus excretion was quantified in oropharyngeal fluid, saliva, nasal fluid, lacrimal fluid, faeces, urine and skin scraping by virus titration and quantitative Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRRT-PCR). Infectious virus Was excreted in all secretions and excretions of Pigs infected with the highly and moderately virulent strain, while excretion front pigs infected with the low virulent strain was mostly restricted to the oronasal route. Pigs infected with the highly virulent strain excreted significantly more virus in all their secretions and excretions over the entire infectious period than pigs infected with the moderately or low virulent strains. An exception were the pigs that developed the chronic form of infection after inoculation with the moderately virulent strain. During the entire infectious period, they excreted the largest amounts of virus via most secretions and excretions, as they excreted virus continuously and for a long duration. This study highlights the crucial role chronically infected pigs may play in the transmission of CSFV. Furthermore, it demonstrates the importance of discriminating between strains and the clinical appearance of infection When using excretion data for modelling. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 22
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Efficacy and stability of a subunit vaccine based on glycoprotein E2 of classical swine fever virus [J].
Bouma, A ;
de Smit, AJ ;
de Kluijver, EP ;
Terpstra, C ;
Moormann, RJM .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 66 (02) :101-114
[2]  
CARBREY EA, 1980, AM J VET RES, V41, P946
[3]  
Depner K. R., 1996, European Journal of Veterinary Pathology, V2, P61
[4]   Influence of breed-related factors on the course of classical swine fever virus infection [J].
Depner, KR ;
Hinrichs, U ;
Bickhardt, K ;
GreiserWilke, I ;
Pohlenz, J ;
Moennig, V ;
Liess, B .
VETERINARY RECORD, 1997, 140 (19) :506-507
[5]   Analytical performance of several classical swine fever laboratory diagnostic techniques on live animals for detection of infection [J].
Dewulf, J ;
Koenen, F ;
Mintiens, K ;
Denis, P ;
Ribbens, S ;
de Kruif, A .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2004, 119 (02) :137-143
[6]   Factors associated with the introduction of classical swine fever virus into pig herds in the central area of the 1997/98 epidemic in the Netherlands [J].
Elbers, ARW ;
Stegeman, JA ;
de Jong, MCM .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2001, 149 (13) :377-382
[7]   The classical swine fever epidemic 1997-1998 in the Netherlands: descriptive epidemiology [J].
Elbers, ARW ;
Stegeman, A ;
Moser, H ;
Ekker, HM ;
Smak, JA ;
Pluimers, FH .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1999, 42 (3-4) :157-184
[8]  
FINNEY DJ, 1978, STATISTICAL METHOD B, P394
[9]   Virulence of recent and former classical swine fever virus isolates evaluated by their clinical and pathological signs [J].
Floegel-Niesmann, G ;
Bunzenthal, C ;
Fischer, S ;
Moennig, V .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE SERIES B-INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND VETERINARY PUBLIC HEALTH, 2003, 50 (05) :214-220
[10]   A COMPARISON OF THE PATHOGENICITY OF 2 STRAINS OF HOG-CHOLERA VIRUS .2. VIROLOGICAL STUDIES [J].
KAMOLSIRIPRICHAIPORN, S ;
MORRISSY, CJ ;
WESTBURY, HA .
AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1992, 69 (10) :245-248