The outcome of different post-thawed culture period in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle

被引:23
作者
Guo, Lei [1 ]
Luo, Chen [1 ]
Quan, Song [1 ]
Chen, Leining [1 ]
Li, Hong [1 ]
Guo, Yangchun [1 ]
Han, Zhiming [2 ]
Ou, Xianghong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Ctr Reprod Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Zool, State Key Lab Reprod Biol, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
关键词
Frozen-thawed embryo transfer; Post-thawed culture; Clinical pregnancy rate; Implantation rate; Live birth rate; CRYOPRESERVATION; VITRIFICATION; SURVIVAL; PREGNANCY; CLEAVAGE; OOCYTES; RATES;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-013-0120-0
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose To study the influence of post-thawed culture (2-4 h and 20-24 h) on the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle. In this retrospective study, a total of 1,353 patients were undergoing the FET treatment at the reproductive medical center between June 2010 and July 2012. 3,398 frozen-thawed embryos were divided in two study groups, depending on their post-thawed culture period: short culture (2-4 h) group and long culture (20-24 h) group. Groups were compared including clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, spontaneous abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, live birth rate and birth weight. When embryos including at least one grade I embryo after thawed transferred, the clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, multiple pregnancy rate, abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, live birth rate and birth weight were similar in the short culture group compared with these in the long culture group. The outcomes of the two approaches (short culture and long culture) are no different in FET cycles.
引用
收藏
页码:1589 / 1594
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] PHYSICAL FACTORS ARE INVOLVED IN THE DESTRUCTION OF EMBRYOS AND OOCYTES DURING FREEZING AND THAWING PROCEDURES
    ASHWOODSMITH, MJ
    MORRIS, GW
    FOWLER, R
    APPLETON, TC
    ASHORN, R
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1988, 3 (06) : 795 - 802
  • [2] A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation
    Balaban, B.
    Urman, B.
    Ata, B.
    Isiklar, A.
    Larman, M. G.
    Harnilton, R.
    Gardner, D. K.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2008, 23 (09) : 1976 - 1982
  • [3] A quantitative analysis of the impact of cryopreservation on the implantation potential of human early cleavage stage embryos
    Edgar, DH
    Bourne, H
    Speirs, AL
    McBain, JC
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (01) : 175 - 179
  • [4] Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE†
    Ferraretti, A. P.
    Goossens, V.
    de Mouzon, J.
    Bhattacharya, S.
    Castilla, J. A.
    Korsak, V.
    Kupka, M.
    Nygren, K. G.
    Andersen, A. Nyboe
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27 (09) : 2571 - 2584
  • [5] Objective way to support embryo transfer: a probabilistic decision
    Gianaroli, L.
    Magli, M. C.
    Gambardella, L.
    Giusti, A.
    Grugnetti, C.
    Corani, G.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (05) : 1210 - 1220
  • [6] Parameters guiding selection of best embryos for transfer after cryopreservation: a reappraisal
    Guerif, F
    Bidault, R
    Cadoret, V
    Couet, ML
    Lansac, J
    Royere, D
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (05) : 1321 - 1326
  • [7] Joshi Bharat V, 2010, J Hum Reprod Sci, V3, P76, DOI 10.4103/0974-1208.69340
  • [8] The predictive value of using a combined Z-score and day 3 embryo morphology score in the assessment of embryo survival on day 5
    Lan, KC
    Huang, FJ
    Lin, YC
    Kung, FT
    Hsieh, CH
    Huang, HW
    Tan, PH
    Chang, SY
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (06) : 1299 - 1306
  • [9] Mocanu E V, 2008, Ir Med J, V101, P181
  • [10] Influence of post-thaw culture on the developmental potential of human frozen embryos
    Rato, Mafalda L.
    Gouveia-Oliveira, Antonio
    Plancha, Carlos E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2012, 29 (08) : 789 - 795