Marginal bone loss around implants placed in maxillary native bone or grafted sinuses: a retrospective cohort study

被引:69
|
作者
Galindo-Moreno, P. [1 ,5 ]
Fernandez-Jimenez, A.
Avila-Ortiz, G. [2 ]
Silvestre, F. J. [3 ]
Hernandez-Cortes, P. [4 ]
Wang, H. L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Surg & Implant Dent, Granada, Spain
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Dent, Dept Periodont, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Valencia, Dept Stomatol, Valencia, Spain
[4] San Cecilio Clin Hosp, Orthoped Surg Unit, Granada, Spain
[5] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
alveolar bone loss; bone grafting; bone resorption; dental implants; maxillary sinus; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; LEVEL CHANGES; PERIODONTALLY HEALTHY; AUGMENTATION OUTCOMES; POSTERIOR MAXILLA; FLOOR ELEVATION; SURVIVAL; DISTANCE; SMOKING; SURFACE;
D O I
10.1111/clr.12122
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo assess differences in marginal bone loss around implants placed in maxillary pristine bone and implants placed following maxillary sinus augmentation over a period of 3years after functional loading. Material and methodsTwo cohorts of subjects (Group 1: Subjects who received sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placement; Group 2: Subjects who underwent conventional implant placement in posterior maxillary pristine bone) were included in this retrospective study. Radiographic marginal bone loss was measured around one implant per patient on digitized panoramic radiographs that were obtained at the time of prosthesis delivery (baseline) and 12, 24, and 36months later. The influence of age, gender, smoking habits, history of periodontal disease, and type of prosthetic connection (internal or external) on marginal bone loss was analyzed in function of the type of osseous support (previously grafted or pristine). ResultsA total of 105 subjects were included in this study. Cumulative radiographic marginal bone loss ranged from 0mm to 3.9mm after 36months of functional loading. There were statistically significant differences in marginal bone loss between implants placed in grafted and pristine bone at the 12-month assessment, but not in the subsequent progression rate. External prosthetic connection, smoking, and history of periodontitis negatively influenced peri-implant bone maintenance, regardless of the type of osseous substrate. ConclusionsImplants placed in sites that received maxillary sinus augmentation exhibited more marginal bone loss than implants placed in pristine bone, although marginal bone loss mainly occurred during the first 12months after functional loading. Implants with external implant connection were strongly associated with increased marginal bone loss overtime.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 384
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interdental Bone Level around Immediately Placed Implants at Maxillary and Mandibular Molar Sites: A Retrospective Radiographic Analysis
    Alasqah, Mohammed
    Alzahrani, Khalid S.
    Gufran, Khalid
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (10):
  • [32] Marginal Bone Loss Around Short Dental Implants Restored at Implant Level and with Transmucosal Abutment: A Retrospective Study
    Hernandez-Marcos, Gabriel
    Hernandez-Herrera, Mariela
    Anitua, Eduardo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2018, 33 (06) : 1362 - 1367
  • [33] Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning
    Sbordone, Ludovico
    Levin, Liran
    Guidetti, Franco
    Sbordone, Carolina
    Glikman, Ari
    Schwartz-Arad, Devorah
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (05) : 485 - 491
  • [34] Retrospective Cohort Study on the Influence of Bone Remodeling on Marginal Bone Loss and Peri-implantitis Around Immediately Loaded Implants Supporting Complete-Arch Restorations
    Sanchez-Torres, Alba
    Cercadillo-Ibarguren, Inaki
    Moragon-Rodriguez, Marta
    Figueiredo, Rui
    Valmaseda-Castellon, Eduard
    Gay-Escoda, Cosme
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2021, 36 (06) : 1165 - 1172
  • [35] Effect of microthread design on the preservation of marginal bone around immediately placed implants: a 5-years prospective cohort study
    Aslroosta, Hoori
    Akbari, Solmaz
    Naddafpour, Nima
    Adnaninia, Seyed Taha
    Khorsand, Afshin
    Namadmalian Esfahani, Niusha
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [36] Effect of microthread design on the preservation of marginal bone around immediately placed implants: a 5-years prospective cohort study
    Hoori Aslroosta
    Solmaz Akbari
    Nima Naddafpour
    Seyed Taha Adnaninia
    Afshin Khorsand
    Niusha Namadmalian Esfahani
    BMC Oral Health, 21
  • [37] Retrospective radiographic study of marginal bone changes of 88 implants placed with split crest technique in the maxillary latero-posterior area
    Longoni, S.
    Maroni, I.
    Baldini, A.
    Sartori, M.
    JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2016, 8 (01) : 8 - 13
  • [38] Occurrence of Progressive Bone Loss Around Anodized Surface Implants and Resorbable Blasting Media Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Kim, Hee-Chang
    Park, Shin-Young
    Han, Min-Su
    Lee, Yong-Moo
    Ku, Young
    Rhyu, In-Chul
    Seol, Yang-Jo
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2017, 88 (04) : 329 - 337
  • [39] A 4-Year Retrospective Radiographic Study of Marginal Bone Loss of 156 Titanium Implants Placed with Ultrasonic Site Preparation
    Schierano, Gianmario
    Vercellotti, Tomaso
    Modica, Fabio
    Corrias, Giorgia
    Russo, Crescenzo
    Cavagnetto, Davide
    Baldi, Domenico
    Romano, Federica
    Carossa, Stefano
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 39 (01) : 115 - 121
  • [40] IMPLANTS INSERTED IN MAXILLARY SINUS GRAFTED WITH FRESH FROZEN HOMOLOGUE ILIAC BONE: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Danza, M.
    Fanali, S.
    Viscioni, A.
    Franco, M.
    Avantaggiato, A.
    Lucchese, A.
    Zollino, I.
    Carinci, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATION, 2011, 9 (01) : 35 - 39