Marginal bone loss around implants placed in maxillary native bone or grafted sinuses: a retrospective cohort study

被引:69
|
作者
Galindo-Moreno, P. [1 ,5 ]
Fernandez-Jimenez, A.
Avila-Ortiz, G. [2 ]
Silvestre, F. J. [3 ]
Hernandez-Cortes, P. [4 ]
Wang, H. L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Surg & Implant Dent, Granada, Spain
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Dent, Dept Periodont, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Valencia, Dept Stomatol, Valencia, Spain
[4] San Cecilio Clin Hosp, Orthoped Surg Unit, Granada, Spain
[5] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
alveolar bone loss; bone grafting; bone resorption; dental implants; maxillary sinus; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; LEVEL CHANGES; PERIODONTALLY HEALTHY; AUGMENTATION OUTCOMES; POSTERIOR MAXILLA; FLOOR ELEVATION; SURVIVAL; DISTANCE; SMOKING; SURFACE;
D O I
10.1111/clr.12122
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo assess differences in marginal bone loss around implants placed in maxillary pristine bone and implants placed following maxillary sinus augmentation over a period of 3years after functional loading. Material and methodsTwo cohorts of subjects (Group 1: Subjects who received sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placement; Group 2: Subjects who underwent conventional implant placement in posterior maxillary pristine bone) were included in this retrospective study. Radiographic marginal bone loss was measured around one implant per patient on digitized panoramic radiographs that were obtained at the time of prosthesis delivery (baseline) and 12, 24, and 36months later. The influence of age, gender, smoking habits, history of periodontal disease, and type of prosthetic connection (internal or external) on marginal bone loss was analyzed in function of the type of osseous support (previously grafted or pristine). ResultsA total of 105 subjects were included in this study. Cumulative radiographic marginal bone loss ranged from 0mm to 3.9mm after 36months of functional loading. There were statistically significant differences in marginal bone loss between implants placed in grafted and pristine bone at the 12-month assessment, but not in the subsequent progression rate. External prosthetic connection, smoking, and history of periodontitis negatively influenced peri-implant bone maintenance, regardless of the type of osseous substrate. ConclusionsImplants placed in sites that received maxillary sinus augmentation exhibited more marginal bone loss than implants placed in pristine bone, although marginal bone loss mainly occurred during the first 12months after functional loading. Implants with external implant connection were strongly associated with increased marginal bone loss overtime.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 384
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Early marginal bone loss around dental implants to define success in implant dentistry: A retrospective study
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    Catena, Andres
    Perez-Sayans, Mario
    Fernandez-Barbero, Juan Emilio
    O'Valle, Francisco
    Padial-Molina, Miguel
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (05) : 630 - 642
  • [22] Frequency of Smoking and Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants: A Retrospective Matched-Control Study
    Ali, Amir
    Al Attar, Ammar
    Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [23] Local and systemic factors associated with marginal bone loss around dental implants: a retrospective clinical study
    Guven, Selda Sule
    Cabbar, Fatih
    Guler, Nurhan
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 51 (02): : 128 - 141
  • [24] Survival of Dental Implants Placed in Grafted and Nongrafted Bone: A Retrospective Study in a University Setting
    Tran, Duong T.
    Gay, Isabel C.
    Diaz-Rodriguez, Janice
    Parthasarathy, Kavitha
    Weltman, Robin
    Friedman, Lawrence
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (02) : 310 - 317
  • [25] Factors affecting the survival of implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses: A clinical report
    Kan, JYK
    Rungcharassaeng, K
    Kim, J
    Lozada, JL
    Goodacre, CJ
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2002, 87 (05): : 485 - 489
  • [26] Comparison of the osseointegration of implants placed in areas grafted with HA/TCP and native bone
    Lima, Julia Raulino
    Ferreira Soares, Priscilla Barbosa
    Pinotti, Felipe Eduardo
    Chierici Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana
    Marcantonio-Junior, Elcio
    Pimentel Lopes Oliveira, Guilherme Jose
    MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 2022, 85 (08) : 2776 - 2783
  • [27] Bone Remodeling around Implants Placed in Augmented Sinuses in Patients with and without History of Periodontitis
    Uribarri, Agurne
    Bilbao, Eneritz
    Marichalar-Mendia, Xabier
    Martinez-Conde, Rafael
    Aguirre, Jose M.
    Verdugo, Fernando
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (02) : 268 - 279
  • [28] Response to "On Crestal/Marginal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants"
    Froum, Stuart J.
    Rosen, Paul S.
    Clem, Donald S., III
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2013, 33 (04) : 407 - 410
  • [29] Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting Fixed Restorations
    Mumcu, Emre
    Bilhan, Hakan
    Cekici, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2011, 37 (05) : 549 - 558
  • [30] A Retrospective Study of Bone Level Stability Around 441 Mandibular and 350 Maxillary Molar Implants Placed with an Immediate Implant Protocol
    Wagenberg, Barry
    Froum, Stuart J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 40 (05) : 635 - 643