Gas Multiple Flow Mechanisms and Apparent Permeability Evaluation in Shale Reservoirs

被引:22
作者
Feng, Xuelei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ma, Fengshan [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Haijun [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Gang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guo, Jie [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, Key Lab Shale Gas & Geoengn, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Earth Sci, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
关键词
shale gas; multiple flow mechanisms; apparent permeability model; dynamic permeability evaluation; numerical simulation; SURFACE-DIFFUSION; NANOPORES; TRANSPORT; MODEL; ADSORPTION; METHANE; PIPES;
D O I
10.3390/su11072114
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Gas flow mechanisms and apparent permeability are important factors for predicating gas production in shale reservoirs. In this study, an apparent permeability model for describing gas multiple flow mechanisms in nanopores is developed and incorporated into the COMSOL solver. In addition, a dynamic permeability equation is proposed to analyze the effects of matrix shrinkage and stress sensitivity. The results indicate that pore size enlargement increases gas seepage capacity of a shale reservoir. Compared to conventional reservoirs, the ratio of apparent permeability to Darcy permeability is higher by about 1-2 orders of magnitude in small pores (1-10 nm) and at low pressures (0-5 MPa) due to multiple flow mechanisms. Flow mechanisms mainly include surface diffusion, Knudsen diffusion, and skip flow. Its weight is affected by pore size, reservoir pressure, and temperature, especially pore size ranging from 1 nm to 5 nm and reservoir pressures below 5 MPa. The combined effects of matrix shrinkage and stress sensitivity induce nanopores closure. Therefore, permeability declines about 1 order of magnitude compare to initial apparent permeability. The results also show that permeability should be adjusted during gas production to ensure a better accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
An C., 2017, P SPE RES CHAR SIM C
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1941, DRILL PROD PRACT, DOI DOI 10.5510/OGP20120200114
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, P SPE ROCK MOUNT REG
[4]  
Bangham D.H., 1938, R SOC, V166, P1471, DOI [10.1098/rspa.1938.0112, DOI 10.1098/RSPA.1938.0112]
[5]  
Beskok A, 1999, MICROSCALE THERM ENG, V3, P43
[6]  
Bird G.A., 2003, Molecular Gas Dynamics and the Direct Simulation of Gas Flows
[7]  
Bird R.B., 2007, TRANSPORT PHENOMENA
[8]   Barnett Shale gas production, Fort Worth Basin: Issues and discussion [J].
Bowker, Kent A. .
AAPG BULLETIN, 2007, 91 (04) :523-533
[9]   THE FLOW OF GASES IN PIPES AT LOW PRESSURES [J].
BROWN, GP ;
DINARDO, A ;
CHENG, GK ;
SHERWOOD, TK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1946, 17 (10) :802-813
[10]  
Carman P.C., 1956, FLOW GASES POROUS ME