More farmers, less farming? Understanding the truncated agrarian transition in Thailand

被引:102
作者
Rigg, Jonathan [1 ,2 ]
Salamanca, Albert [3 ]
Phongsiri, Monchai [4 ]
Sripun, Mattara [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Asia Res Inst, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Geog, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260, Singapore
[3] Stockholm Environm Inst, Bangkok, Thailand
[4] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Res Grp Wellbeing & Sustainable Dev WeSD, Khon Kaen, Thailand
关键词
Rural development; Agrarian transition; Smallholders; Precarity; Asia; Thailand; FUTURE; LAND; SIZE; ASIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.008
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Drawing on rural field research in three provinces of Northeast Thailand, the paper seeks to understand the ways in which life course, generational, era-defining and developmental change intersect, and why rural smallholders and smallholdings continue to persist notwithstanding deep structural change. We outline the creative ways that households and their members have sought to address the scissor effects of declining land holdings, rising needs, reduced relative returns to agriculture, and often precarious non-farm work. We posit, drawing on this work from Thailand, that while Asia's 'truncated agrarian transition' goes some way to explaining the current empirical fact of persistent smallholders, we raise doubts whether the rural development agenda of modernisation, marketisation and rural exit will have the traction that governments and some scholars anticipate. A focus on production obscures how rural livelihoods also embody acts of consumption, care, reproduction and redistribution. Our study finds that the current experience of occupational multiplicity where households' livelihoods comprise farm and non-farm, commoditised and quasi-subsistence, in situ and ex situ, production and care, and reproduction and redistribution will likely also persist, if non-farm occupations remains classically precarious and social safety nets thinly woven. The paper contributes to debates over agrarian and rural livelihood transitions in Asia, and sheds explanatory light on why the farm-size transition has not taken hold. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 337
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Amyot J., 1976, VILLAGE AYUTTHAYA SO
[2]  
[Anonymous], PRECARIAT NEW DANGER
[3]  
Bray F, 2015, RICE: GLOBAL NETWORKS AND NEW HISTORIES, P1
[4]  
Bray Francesca, 1986, The rice economies: Technology and development in Asian societies
[5]   Red-Shirt Heartland: Village-Level Socioeconomic Change in Northeast Thailand Between 1999 and 2008 [J].
de Jong, Edwin ;
Knippenberg, Luuk ;
Ayuwat, Dusadee ;
Promphakping, Buapun .
ASIAN POLITICS & POLICY, 2012, 4 (02) :215-233
[6]   Agriculture and development: revisiting the policy narratives [J].
Dercon, Stefan .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 44 :183-187
[7]   LAND POLICIES AND FARM PERFORMANCE IN THAILAND FOREST RESERVE AREAS [J].
FEDER, G ;
ONCHAN, T ;
CHALAMWONG, Y .
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 1988, 36 (03) :483-501
[8]  
Ferguson James., 2015, GIVE A MAN A FISH
[10]   Rural-urban transformation and village economy in emerging market economies during economic crisis: empirical evidence from Thailand [J].
Goedecke, Theda ;
Waibel, Hermann .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF REGIONS ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 2011, 4 (02) :205-219