Inherent factors limiting the use of laser diffraction for determining particle size distributions of soil and related samples

被引:32
作者
Kowalenko, C. G. [1 ]
Babuin, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Agrifood Res Ctr, Agassiz, BC V0M 1A0, Canada
关键词
Particle size analysis; Laser diffraction; Texture; PIPETTE-METHOD; SEDIMENTS; ANALYZER;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.09.006
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
A number of reports have proposed that recently developed laser diffraction instruments show potential for automating the measurement of particle size distributions (texture) in soil and related materials, but relationships to standard sieve-sedimentation measurements have been poor and inconsistent. Measurements with a commercially available laser diffraction instrument (Horiba LA-920) on five soils having a wide range of textures (silty clay to sand) showed wide variability for proportions of clay, silt and sand when the weight of the sample was varied resulting in unacceptable consistency and conformity with hydrometer measurements. Detailed measurements were subsequently made on systematic combinations of four known silt size fractions (0-5, 38-45, 75-90 and 125-150 mu m diameter), to explore the reasons for the variable results. Samples weighing less than 0.10, 0.15 and 0.20 g of the 38-45, 75-90 and 125-150 mu m diameter fractions, respectively, were not detected by the instrument. Calculations of the probable numbers of particles in these samples ranged from 0.06 x 10(6) to 1.0 x 10(6). There were, however, 2445 x 10(6) particle in a 0.05 g of 0-5 mu m diameter sample, and was detected by the instrument. This showed that there is a threshold of the number of particles required for detection. Alternatively, similar and greater weights of small diameter particles result in potential saturation of the detector. Saturation occurred when laser light transmission was low (<20%). Even before saturation of the detector, an interaction was detected when combinations of small and large particles were mixed such that the proportion of small particles tended to be over-estimated and large particles under-estimated. Percentage laser light transmission measurements were inadequate to guide development of calibrations to correct for threshold/saturation limits and light competition problems. It was concluded that the geometric change in numbers of particles as the size decreases in a given weight of sample is too large to allow the use of current laser diffraction instrumentation for particle analyses of soil and related samples where the sizes in the distribution are from clay to sand or even with a narrower range of sizes (e.g., clay or silt). Crown Copyright (c) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 28
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   A fast method for determining soil particle size distribution using a laser instrument [J].
Arriaga, Francisco J. ;
Lowery, Birl ;
Mays, M. Dewayne .
SOIL SCIENCE, 2006, 171 (09) :663-674
[2]   Fitting Performance of Particle-size Distribution Models on Data Derived by Conventional and Laser Diffraction Techniques [J].
Bah, Abdul R. ;
Kravchuk, Olena ;
Kirchhof, Gunnar .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2009, 73 (04) :1101-1107
[3]   Grain-size analysis by laser diffractometry: comparison with the sieve-pipette method [J].
Beuselinck, L ;
Govers, G ;
Poesen, J ;
Degraer, G .
CATENA, 1998, 32 (3-4) :193-208
[4]   Laser-diffraction and pipette-method grain sizing of Dutch sediments: correlations for fine fractions of marine, fluvial, and loess samples [J].
Buurman, P ;
Pape, T ;
Reijneveld, JA ;
de Jong, F ;
van Gelder, E .
GEOLOGIE EN MIJNBOUW-NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2001, 80 (02) :49-57
[5]   Laser grain-size determination in soil genetic studies .1. Practical problems [J].
Buurman, P ;
Pape, T ;
Muggler, CC .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1997, 162 (03) :211-218
[6]  
Day P.R., 1965, AGRONOMY, P545, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR9.1.C43
[7]  
Eshel G, 2004, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V68, P736, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2004.0736
[8]   Comparison of laser grain size analysis with pipette and sieve analysis: A solution for the underestimation of the clay fraction [J].
Konert, M ;
Vandenberghe, J .
SEDIMENTOLOGY, 1997, 44 (03) :523-535
[9]  
Kroetsch D., 2008, Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, P713, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781420005271.CH55
[10]   EVALUATION OF A WIDE-RANGE LASER DIFFRACTION GRAIN-SIZE ANALYZER FOR USE WITH SEDIMENTS [J].
LOIZEAU, JL ;
ARBOUILLE, D ;
SANTIAGO, S ;
VERNET, JP .
SEDIMENTOLOGY, 1994, 41 (02) :353-361