Regulating the communication of genetic risk information: the Italian legal approach to questions of confidentiality and disclosure

被引:9
作者
Battistuzzi, L. [1 ]
Ciliberti, R.
Forzano, F. [2 ]
De Stefano, F.
机构
[1] Univ Genoa, Dept Hlth Sci, Sect Bioeth, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[2] Galliera Hosp, Clin Genet Unit, Genoa, Italy
关键词
communication; confidentiality; disclosure; genetic counseling; genetic testing; CANCER; FAMILIES; MEMBERS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01935.x
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Communication of genetic risk is a complex process in which the rights of the individual and those of relatives may conflict with regard to the information revealed by DNA testing. If patients who participate in clinical genetic testing refuse to share their genetic information with at-risk relatives, healthcare professionals need to reach a proper ethical balance between the right of individual patients regarding the confidentiality of their genetic test result and the right of families to be informed about their genetic risk. Rules and legislation in most countries generally protect the confidentiality of medical information but allow limited disclosure of genetic test results without the patient's consent in specific cases when certain conditions are met. The aim of this article is to draw attention to how Italian policymakers have attempted to balance protection of autonomy and confidentiality, and protection of health by means of a hybrid instrument. Furthermore, we show that some of the requirements of that instrument depart from the most widely recognized standards for non-consensual disclosure of genetic risk information, while at the same time allowing an unusually high level of discretion to healthcare professionals involved in genetic counseling and testing.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 209
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Direct contact in inviting high-risk members of hereditary colon cancer families to genetic counselling and DNA testing [J].
Aktan-Collan, K. ;
Haukkala, A. ;
Pylvanainen, K. ;
Jarvinen, H. J. ;
Aaltonen, L. A. ;
Peltomaki, P. ;
Rantanen, E. ;
Kaariainen, H. ;
Mecklin, J-P .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2007, 44 (11) :732-738
[2]   An audit of clinical service examining the uptake of genetic testing by at-risk family members [J].
Forrest, Laura ;
Delatycki, Martin ;
Curnow, Lisette ;
Skene, Loane ;
Aitken, MaryAnne .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (01) :122-128
[3]   Process and outcome in communication of genetic information within families: a systematic review [J].
Gaff, Clara L. ;
Clarke, Angus J. ;
Atkinson, Paul ;
Sivell, Stephanie ;
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Iredale, Rachel ;
Thornton, Hazel ;
Dundon, Joanna ;
Shaw, Chris ;
Edwards, Adrian .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2007, 15 (10) :999-1011
[4]  
Gold J, 2004, MCGILL J MED, P72
[5]   Controversies and ethical issues in cancer-genetics clinics [J].
Harris, M ;
Winship, I ;
Spriggs, M .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (05) :301-310
[6]  
[Human Genome Organization Ethical Legal and Social Issues Committee], 1998, STAT DNA SAMPL CONTR
[7]  
Italian Data Protection Authority, 2007, OFFICIAL GAZETTE ITA
[8]  
Italian Data Protection Authority, 2011, OFFICIAL GAZETTE ITA
[9]  
Italian Data Protection Authority, 1999, DEC 8276
[10]  
JARVINEN HJ, 2003, GUT, V52, P19