Image Quality Comparison between Synthetic 2D Mammograms Obtained with 15° and 40° X-ray Tube Angular Range: A Quantitative Phantom Study

被引:2
作者
Lamastra, R. [1 ,2 ]
Barca, P. [1 ,2 ]
Bisogni, M. G. [1 ,2 ]
Caramella, D. [3 ]
Rosso, V [1 ,2 ]
Tucciariello, R. M. [1 ,2 ]
Traino, A. C. [4 ]
Fantacci, M. E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Phys, Pisa, Italy
[2] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Pisa Sect, Pisa, Italy
[3] Univ Pisa, Dept Translat Res New Technol Med & Surg, Pisa, Italy
[4] Azienda Osped Univ Pisana, Pisa Univ Hosp, Unit Med Phys, Pisa, Italy
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 2: BIOIMAGING | 2020年
关键词
Synthesized Mammography; Digital Breast Tomosynthesis; Image Quality; Angular Range; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; SYNTHESIZED MAMMOGRAMS; PERFORMANCE; 2D-MAMMOGRAPHY; IMPLEMENTATION; COMBINATION; GEOMETRY; DBT;
D O I
10.5220/0009147601840191
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In this work we present an image quality comparison between synthesized mammograms (SMs) obtained from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) acquisitions with 15 degrees (SM15) and 40 degrees (SM40) X-ray tube angular range. In fact, since wide-angle DBT is characterized by a better spatial resolution in depth but also by worse performance in detecting microcalcifications than narrow-angle DBT, an objective image quality analysis of SM images could be of pratical interest. Four phantoms were employed in this study and their images were acquired using an Amulet Innovality mammographic device. The image quality comparison was conducted by evaluating spatial resolution, contrast and noise properties of the images. Our results show that SM40 images are characterized by better spatial resolution performance than SMI5 in terms of Modulation Transfer Function but also by worse performance in the detection of low-contrast details. In fact, higher contrast-tonoise ratio values were obtained with SM15 than with SM40. Noise properties of the images were also investigated through the Noise Power Spectrum (NPS) calculation: no differences in NPS shapes were found in both modalities, while noise magnitude results significantly different. In addition, Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) spatial distribution evaluation was assessed by computing SNR maps, in which different pattern were observed.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 191
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Comparison Between Digital and Synthetic 2D Mammograms in Breast Density Interpretation [J].
Alshafeiy, Taghreed I. ;
Wadih, Antoine ;
Nicholson, Brandi T. ;
Rochman, Carrie M. ;
Peppard, Heather R. ;
Patrie, James T. ;
Harvey, Jennifer A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (01) :W36-W41
[2]   A comparative study of physical image quality in digital and synthetic mammography from commercially available mammography systems [J].
Baldelli, Paola ;
Bertolini, Marco ;
Contillo, Adriano ;
Della Gala, Giuseppe ;
Golinelli, Paola ;
Pagan, Laura ;
Rivetti, Stefano ;
Taibi, Angelo .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (16)
[3]   Comprehensive assessment of image quality in synthetic and digital mammography: a quantitative comparison [J].
Barca, Patrizio ;
Lamastra, Rocco ;
Aringhieri, Giacomo ;
Tucciariello, Raffaele Maria ;
Traino, Antonio ;
Fantacci, Maria Evelina .
AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2019, 42 (04) :1141-1152
[4]   Characterization of Breast Masses in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammograms: An Observer Performance Study [J].
Chan, Heang-Ping ;
Helvie, Mark A. ;
Hadjiiski, Lubomir ;
Jeffries, Deborah O. ;
Klein, Katherine A. ;
Neal, Colleen H. ;
Noroozian, Mitra ;
Paramagul, Chintana ;
Roubidoux, Marilyn A. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (11) :1372-1379
[5]   Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Observer Performance of Clustered Microcalcification Detection on Breast Phantom Images Acquired with an Experimental System Using Variable Scan Angles, Angular Increments, and Number of Projection Views [J].
Chan, Heang-Ping ;
Goodsitt, Mitchell M. ;
Helvie, Mark A. ;
Zelakiewicz, Scott ;
Schmitz, Andrea ;
Noroozian, Mitra ;
Paramagul, Chintana ;
Roubidoux, Marilyn A. ;
Nees, Alexis V. ;
Neal, Colleen H. ;
Carson, Paul ;
Lu, Yao ;
Hadjiiski, Lubomir ;
Wei, Jun .
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 273 (03) :675-685
[6]   Synthesized Mammography: Clinical Evidence, Appearance, and Implementation [J].
Durand, Melissa A. .
DIAGNOSTICS, 2018, 8 (02)
[7]  
EFOMP, 2015, MAMM PROT QUAL CONTR
[8]  
EUREF, 2016, PROT QUAL CONTR PHYS
[9]  
EUREF, 2006, EUROPEAN GUIDELINES
[10]  
Fluke Biomedical, 2005, MAMMOGRAPHIC ACCREDI