Early experience with Laparoscopic Mini-Gastric Bypass (One Anastomosis Bypass) in comparison with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in obese patients for bariatric surgery.

被引：0

作者：

Quiros, H. E. ^{[1
]}

Melnik, I. ^{[2
]}

Kogan, E. ^{[3
]}

Dukhno, O. ^{[4
]}

Yoffe, B. ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Barzilai Univ, Med Ctr, Mexico City, DF, Mexico

[2] Barzilai Univ, Med Ctr, Ashqelon, Israel

[3] Barzilai Univ, Med Ctr, Bariatr Surg Outpatient Clin, Ashqelon, Israel

[4] Barzilai Univ, Med Ctr, Laparoscop Surg & Bariatr Surg, Ashqelon, Israel

[5] Barzilai Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gen & Vasc Surg, Ashqelon, Israel

来源：

IFSO15: 20TH WORLD CONGRESS | 2016年

关键词：

Mini-gastric bypass; One Anastomosis Bypass; Sleeve Gastrectomy; bariatric complications; leak;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Obesity is a worldwide public health problem, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in the United States more than one third of adults are obese. Bariatric surgery has arisen as one of the solutions for this problem. In the last years Laparoscopic Mini-Gastric Bypass (LMGB) or One Anastomosis Bypass has gain popularity and has been shown as a safe and successful method to cure Obesity. The purpose of this study was to present our experience with this surgery in comparison with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). Our results showed that LMGB had a minor complication rate of 7.4% in comparison with 0.71% of those patients that underwent LSG. In our population the moderate/severe complications rate (Anastomotic leak, gastric volvulus, etc.) was higher in the patients that underwent LSG (3.7%-5.0%, LMGB-LSG). Our conclusion is that LMGB is a safer and effective bariatric procedure in obese patients with less moderate/severe complication rates in comparison with those that underwent LSG. Laparoscopic Mini-Gastric bypass can also serve as a salvage procedure after failure of a previous bariatric surgery.

引用

页码：73 / 77

页数：5