Difference-in-differences when the treatment status is observed in only one period

被引:31
作者
Botosaru, Irene [1 ]
Gutierrez, Federico H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Econ, Burnaby, BC, Canada
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Econ, 415 Calhoun Hall, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
关键词
MALARIA ERADICATION; NONLINEAR MODELS; SELECTION BIAS; PROGRAMS; IDENTIFICATION; VARIABLES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1002/jae.2583
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper considers the difference-in-differences (DID) method when the data come from repeated cross-sections and the treatment status is observed either before or after the implementation of a program. We propose a new method that point-identifies the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) via a DID method when there is at least one proxy variable for the latent treatment. Key assumptions are the stationarity of the propensity score conditional on the proxy and an exclusion restriction that the proxy must satisfy with respect to the change in average outcomes over time conditional on the true treatment status. We propose a generalized method of moments estimator for the ATT and we show that the associated overidentification test can be used to test our key assumptions. The method is used to evaluate JUNTOS, a Peruvian conditional cash transfer program. We find that the program significantly increased the demand for health inputs among children and women of reproductive age.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 90
页数:18
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   Efficiency Bounds for Missing Data Models With Semiparametric Restrictions [J].
Graham, Bryan S. .
ECONOMETRICA, 2011, 79 (02) :437-452
[12]   The effect of Hurricane Katrina on the labor market outcomes of evacuees [J].
Groen, Jeffrey A. ;
Polivka, Anne E. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (02) :43-48
[13]   Characterizing selection bias using experimental data [J].
Heckman, J ;
Ichimura, H ;
Smith, J ;
Todd, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1998, 66 (05) :1017-1098
[14]   Sources of selection bias in evaluating social programs: An interpretation of conventional measures and evidence on the effectiveness of matching as a program evaluation method [J].
Heckman, JJ ;
Ichimura, H ;
Smith, J ;
Todd, P .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (23) :13416-13420
[15]   Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme [J].
Heckman, JJ ;
Ichimura, H ;
Todd, PE .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1997, 64 (04) :605-654
[16]   Identification and estimation of nonlinear models with misclassification error using instrumental variables: A general solution [J].
Hu, Yingyao .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2008, 144 (01) :27-61
[17]  
Imbens GW, 2015, CAUSAL INFERENCE FOR STATISTICS, SOCIAL, AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES: AN INTRODUCTION, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139025751
[18]  
LALONDE RJ, 1986, AM ECON REV, V76, P604
[19]  
Levy D., 2003, Evaluation of Jamaica's PATH Program: Methodology Report
[20]   Estimation of average treatment effects with misclassification [J].
Lewbel, Arthur .
ECONOMETRICA, 2007, 75 (02) :537-551