Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:110
作者
Levine, Lisa D.
Downes, Katheryne L.
Elovitz, Michal A.
Parry, Samuel
Sammel, Mary D.
Srinivas, Sindhu K.
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Maternal & Child Hlth Res Program, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Womens Hlth Clin Res Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
FOLEY CATHETER; VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL; COMBINATION; BALLOON;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000001778
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of four commonly used induction methods. METHODS: This randomized trial compared four induction methods: misoprostol alone, Foley alone, misoprostol-cervical Foley concurrently, and Foley-oxytocin concurrently. Women undergoing labor induction with full-term (37 weeks of gestation or greater), singleton, vertex-presenting gestations, with no contraindication to vaginal delivery, intact membranes, Bishop score 6 or less, and cervical dilation 2 cm or less were included. Women were enrolled only once during the study period. Our primary outcome was time to delivery. Neither patients nor health care providers were blinded to assigned treatment group because examinations are required for placement of all methods; however, research personnel were blinded during data abstraction. A sample size of 123 per group (n=492) was planned to compare the four groups pairwise (p <=.008) with a 4-hour reduction in delivery time considered clinically meaningful. RESULTS: From May 2013 through June 2015, 997 women were screened and 491 were randomized and analyzed. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar among the four treatment groups. When comparing all induction method groups, combination methods achieved a faster median time to delivery than single-agent methods (misoprostol-Foley: 13.1 hours, Foley-oxytocin: 14.5 hours, misoprostol: 17.6 hours, Foley: 17.7 hours, P<.001). When censored for cesarean delivery and adjusting for parity, women who received misoprostol-Foley were almost twice as likely to deliver before women who received misoprostol alone (hazard ratio 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-2.59) or Foley alone (hazard ratio 1.87, 95% CI 1.87 1.39-2.52), whereas Foley-oxytocin was not statistically different from single-agent methods. CONCLUSION: After censoring for cesarean delivery and adjusting for parity, misoprostol-cervical Foley resulted in twice the chance of delivering before either single-agent method.
引用
收藏
页码:1357 / 1364
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour
    Alfirevic, Zarko
    Kelly, Anthony J.
    Dowswell, Therese
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (04):
  • [2] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2009, Obstet Gynecol, V113, P451, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31819930b0
  • [3] Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: A randomized trial of 3 techniques
    Barrilleaux, PS
    Bofill, JA
    Terrone, DA
    Magann, EF
    May, WL
    Morrison, JC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (06) : 1124 - 1129
  • [4] Combination of Foley Bulb and Vaginal Misoprostol Compared With Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Carbone, Jeanine F.
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Fogertey, Patricia J.
    Roehl, Kimberly A.
    Macones, George A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (02) : 247 - 252
  • [5] A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction
    Chung, JH
    Huang, WH
    Rumney, PJ
    Garite, TJ
    Nageotte, MP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (04) : 1031 - 1035
  • [6] Labor Induction With a Foley Balloon Inflated to 30 mL Compared With 60 mL A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Delaney, Shani
    Shaffer, Brian L.
    Cheng, Yvonne W.
    Vargas, Juan
    Sparks, Teresa N.
    Paul, Kathleen
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 115 (06) : 1239 - 1245
  • [7] Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
    Harris, Paul A.
    Taylor, Robert
    Thielke, Robert
    Payne, Jonathon
    Gonzalez, Nathaniel
    Conde, Jose G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2009, 42 (02) : 377 - 381
  • [8] A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Vaginal Misoprostol versus Cervical Foley Plus Oral Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction
    Hill, James B.
    Thigpen, Brad D.
    Bofill, James A.
    Magann, Everett
    Moore, Lisa E.
    Martin, James N., Jr.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2009, 26 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [9] Mechanical methods for induction of labour
    Jozwiak, Marta
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
    Kelly, Anthony J.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    Irion, Olivier
    Boulvain, Michel
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (03):
  • [10] Transcervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for cervical ripening - A randomized controlled trial
    Pettker, Christian M.
    Pocock, Sean B.
    Smok, Dorothy P.
    Lee, Shing M.
    Devine, Patricia C.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (06) : 1320 - 1326