Piezoelectric or Conventional Osteotomy in Rhinoplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

被引:12
作者
Tsikopoulos, Alexios [1 ]
Tsikopoulos, Konstantinos [2 ]
Doxani, Chrysoula [1 ]
Vagdatli, Eleni [3 ]
Meroni, Gabriele [4 ]
Skoulakis, Charalambos [5 ]
Stefanidis, Ioannis [6 ]
Zintzaras, Elias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Thessaly, Sch Med, Lab Biomath, Larisa, Greece
[2] 424 Army Gen Training Hosp, Thessaloniki, Greece
[3] Hippokrateion Hosp, Microbiol Dept, Thessaloniki, Greece
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Thessaly, Sch Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Larisa, Greece
[6] Univ Thessaly, Sch Med, Dept Nephrol, Larisa, Greece
来源
ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY HEAD AND NECK SURGERY | 2020年 / 82卷 / 04期
关键词
Rhinoplasty; Osteotomy; Piezosurgery; Edema; Ecchymosis; Pain; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; EXTERNAL OSTEOTOMY; LATERAL OSTEOTOMY; PIEZOSURGERY; EDEMA; ECCHYMOSIS;
D O I
10.1159/000506707
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Introduction:Osteotomy of nasal bones in rhinoplasty is associated with postsurgical morbidities. Recent evidence has suggested that a surgical method applying piezoelectric ultrasound waves for nasal osteotomies in rhinoplasty reduces soft tissue damage and causes less postsurgical morbidities compared to conventional methods. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of piezoelectric and conventional lateral nasal osteotomies in rhinoplasty.Methods:We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, and Web of Science up to 17 August 2019 for studies comparing postoperative outcomes of piezoelectric and conventional lateral osteotomies in rhinoplasty. We included studies comparing results of patients subjected to piezoelectric or conventional lateral nasal osteotomies in rhinoplasty. For outcomes, we considered postoperative pain, eyelid edema, periorbital ecchymosis, and intraoperative mucosal injury.Results:For eyelid edema, a statistically significant difference in favor of piezoelectric osteotomy was documented within the first 3 postoperative days (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.65; 95% CI = -1.18, -0.12,p= 0.02;I-2 = 69%) and on postoperative day 7 (SMD = -0.69; 95% CI = -1.47, -0.09;p= 0.08;I-2 = 85%). This was also the case for periorbital ecchymosis within the first 3 postoperative days (SMD = -0.85; 95% CI = -1.42, -0.28;p= 0.004;I-2 = 72%) and on postoperative day 7 (SMD = -0.52; 95% CI = -0.79, -0.24;p= 0.0003;I-2 = 71%). Intraoperative mucosal injury (OR = 0.06; 95% CI = 0.01, 0.53;p= 0.01;Iota(2) = 0%) and postoperative pain (SMD = -0.99; 95% CI = -1.78, -0.11;p= 0.01;I-2 = 49%) were also statistically lower during piezoelectric osteotomies.Conclusions:This study shows that lateral piezoelectric osteotomy in rhinoplasty decreases postoperative pain, edema, ecchymosis, and intraoperative mucosa injuries compared to the conventional osteotomy technique with a chisel. Piezoelectric osteotomies are especially associated with less postoperative edema and ecchymosis in osteotomies not executed under direct vision.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 233
页数:18
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], REV MAN REVMAN 5 1
[2]   The lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty: Clinical and radiographic rationale for osteotome selection [J].
Becker, DG ;
McLaughlin, RB ;
Loevner, LA ;
Mang, A .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 105 (05) :1806-1816
[3]   How can periorbital oedema and ecchymose be reduced in rhinoplasty? [J].
Caglar, Erdem ;
Celebi, Saban ;
Topak, Murat ;
Develioglu, Necati Omer ;
Yalcin, Enis ;
Kulekci, Mehmet .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 273 (09) :2549-2554
[4]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[5]   Comparison of Piezosurgery and Conventional Osteotomy Post Rhinoplasty Morbidities: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Fallahi, Hamid Reza ;
Keyhan, Seied Omid ;
Fattahi, Tirbod ;
Mohiti, Amir Khosrow .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (05) :1050-1055
[6]   The Role of Piezoelectric Instrumentation in Rhinoplasty Surgery [J].
Gerbault, Olivier ;
Daniel, Rollin K. ;
Kosins, Aaron M. .
AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2016, 36 (01) :21-34
[7]   External osteotomy in rhinoplasty [J].
Giacomarra, V ;
Russolo, M ;
Arnez, ZM ;
Tirelli, G .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2001, 111 (03) :433-438
[8]  
GOLDFARB M, 1993, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V119, P624
[9]   The optimal medial osteotomy: A study of nasal bone thickness and fracture patterns [J].
Harshbarger, RJ ;
Sullivan, PK .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 108 (07) :2114-2119
[10]  
Higgins J., 2008, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions