Estimating implicit discount rate for energy efficiency investment using the contingent valuation method: a case study in South Korea

被引:6
作者
Park, Jiyong [1 ]
Woo, JongRoul [2 ]
Jin, Taeyoung [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Energy Econ Inst, Dist Heating & Power Res Team, 405-11 Jongga Ro, Ulsan 44543, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Grad Sch Energy & Environm, Energy Environm Policy & Technol, 145 Anam Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
关键词
Contingent valuation method; Implicit discount rate; Energy efficiency investment; Cognitive reflection test; DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE; RENEWABLE ENERGY; COGNITIVE REFLECTION; TIME PREFERENCE; ECONOMIC VALUE; RISK-AVERSION; GROWTH; COST; WILLINGNESS; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1007/s12053-022-10076-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study measures the implicit discount rate (IDR) for energy efficiency investment at the household level. Our pioneering attempt to use the contingent valuation method suggests fresh insights into relieving the possible problems induced when the IDR is estimated using multiple price list and open-ended questions. Using the survey data from 2392 respondents in South Korea, we measured the IDR for appliances with high energy efficiency. The measurement ranges from 21.80 to 25.94%, implying the overestimation in existing literature. This study contributes to the literature by determining the role of cognition and experience in energy efficiency investment. Cognition has a statistically significant negative impact on IDR and depends on the appliance type, whereas risk preference has no meaningful impact. Energy efficiency improvement experiences are the critical factor in reducing IDR, that is, promoting energy efficiency investment, especially for recently introduced appliances. Overall, our finding suggests that information that induces high cognition on the cost-benefit analysis and energy efficiency labeling can lower IDR and thus promote energy efficiency. Our study also suggests that targeting energy consumers who have experience in energy-saving campaigns or programs could be a priority because such experiences are crucial to IDR reduction.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Elicitation using multiple price list formats (vol 9, pg 383, 2006) [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten Igel ;
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 (01) :99-100
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, International Energy Outlook
[3]   Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-growth nexus: Evidence from a panel error correction model [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Payne, James E. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (03) :733-738
[4]   Energy consumption and economic growth in Central America: Evidence from a panel cointegration and error correction model [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Payne, James E. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 (02) :211-216
[5]  
Arrow Kenneth., 1993, Federal Register, V58
[6]  
Berkovec J., 1983, HEATING SYSTEM APPLI
[7]   MEASURING VALUES OF EXTRA-MARKET GOODS - ARE INDIRECT MEASURES BIASED [J].
BISHOP, RC ;
HEBERLEIN, TA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1979, 61 (05) :926-930
[8]   Choice Consistency and Preference Stability in Test-Retests of Discrete Choice Experiment and Open-Ended Willingness to Pay Elicitation Formats [J].
Brouwer, Roy ;
Logar, Ivana ;
Sheremet, Oleg .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2017, 68 (03) :729-751
[9]   The role of personality traits in green decision-making [J].
Busic-Sontic, Ante ;
Czap, Natalia V. ;
Fuerst, Franz .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 62 :313-328
[10]   ESTIMATION USING CONTINGENT VALUATION DATA FROM A DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE WITH FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
CAMERON, TA ;
QUIGGIN, J .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 27 (03) :218-234