A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions

被引:180
作者
Jackson, Cath [1 ]
Cheater, Francine M. [1 ]
Reid, Innes [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Healthcare, Leeds LS2 9UT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
decision; MMR; parent; shared decision making; systematic review;
D O I
10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00496.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To identify the decision support needs of parents attempting to make an informed health decision on behalf of a child. Context The first step towards implementing patient decision support is to assess patients' information and decision-making needs. Search strategy A systematic search of key bibliographic databases for decision support studies was performed in 2005. Reference lists of relevant review articles and key authors were searched. Three relevant journals were hand searched. Inclusion criteria Non-intervention studies containing data on decision support needs of parents making child health decisions. Data extraction and synthesis Data were extracted on study characteristics, decision focus and decision support needs. Studies were quality assessed using a pre-defined set of criteria. Data synthesis used the UK Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre approach. Main results One-hundred and forty nine studies were included across various child health decisions, settings and study designs. Thematic analysis of decision support needs indicated three key issues: (i) information (including suggestions about the content, delivery, source, timing); (ii) talking to others (including concerns about pressure from others); and (iii) feeling a sense of control over the process that could be influenced by emotionally charged decisions, the consultation process, and structural or service barriers. These were consistent across decision type, study design and whether or not the study focused on informed decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 251
页数:20
相关论文
共 191 条
[91]  
Holm Kristen E, 2003, J Pediatr Oncol Nurs, V20, P301, DOI 10.1177/1043454203254984
[92]  
Houston Anna M., 2000, Health Expect, V3, P234, DOI 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00109.x
[93]   The routine and the traumatic in prenatal genetic diagnosis:: does clinical information inform patient decision-making? [J].
Hunt, LM ;
de Voogd, KB ;
Castañeda, H .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2005, 56 (03) :302-312
[94]   Informed choice in women attending private clinics to undergo first-trimester screening for Down syndrome [J].
Jaques, AM ;
Sheffield, LJ ;
Halliday, JL .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2005, 25 (08) :656-664
[95]   People who influence women's decisions and preferred sources of information about prenatal testing for birth defects [J].
Jaques, AM ;
Bell, RJ ;
Watson, L ;
Halliday, JL .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 44 (03) :233-238
[96]  
Jepson R G, 2001, Health Expect, V4, P116, DOI 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00143.x
[97]  
Jewell D, 2001, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V51, P875
[98]   Mother and child health care in Kabul, Afghanistan with focus on the mother: women's own perspective [J].
Kaartinen, L ;
Diwan, V .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 81 (06) :491-501
[99]  
Kai J, 1996, BRIT MED J, V313, P987
[100]  
Kenen R, 2000, J Genet Couns, V9, P33, DOI 10.1023/A:1009429106757