Physician response to financial incentives when choosing drugs to treat breast cancer

被引:17
|
作者
Epstein, Andrew J. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Johnson, Scott J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Precis Hlth Econ, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Philadelphia Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Equ Res & Promot, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FINANCE & ECONOMICS | 2012年 / 12卷 / 04期
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Agency; Physician treatment decisions; Financial incentives; Medicare; Reimbursement; SEER-MEDICARE DATA; HEALTH-CARE; PRESCRIPTION DECISION; PATIENTS PREFERENCES; CESAREAN DELIVERY; MODELS; ENDOGENEITY; PATTERNS; DOCTORS; CHOICES;
D O I
10.1007/s10754-012-9117-y
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper considers physician agency in choosing drugs to treat metastatic breast cancer, a clinical setting in which patients have few protections from physicians' rent seeking. Physicians have explicit financial incentives attached to each potential drug treatment, with profit margins ranging more than a hundred fold. SEER-Medicare claims and Medispan pricing data were formed into a panel of 4,503 patients who were diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and treated with anti-cancer drugs from 1992 to 2002. We analyzed the effects of product attributes, including profit margin, randomized controlled trial citations, FDA label, generic status, and other covariates on therapy choice. Instruments and drug fixed effects were used to control for omitted variables and possible measurement error associated with margin. We find that increasing physician margin by 10% yields between an 11 and 177% increase in the likelihood of drug choice on average across drugs. Physicians were more likely to use drugs with which they had experience, had more citations, and were FDA-approved to treat breast cancer. Oncologists are susceptible to financial incentives when choosing drugs, though other factors play a large role in their choice of drug.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 302
页数:18
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Physician response to financial incentives when choosing drugs to treat breast cancer
    Andrew J. Epstein
    Scott J. Johnson
    International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 2012, 12 : 285 - 302
  • [2] What are GPs' preferences for financial and non-financial incentives in cancer screening? Evidence for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers
    Sicsic, Jonathan
    Krucien, Nicolas
    Franc, Carine
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2016, 167 : 116 - 127
  • [3] Changing Physician Incentives For Cancer Care To Reward Better Patient Outcomes Instead Of Use Of More Costly Drugs
    Newcomer, Lee N.
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2012, 31 (04) : 780 - 785
  • [4] Effect of provider and patient reminders, deployment of nurse practitioners, and financial incentives on cervical and breast cancer screening rates
    Kaczorowski, Janusz
    Hearps, Stephen J. C.
    Lohfeld, Lynne
    Goeree, Ron
    Donald, Faith
    Burgess, Ken
    Sebaldt, Rolf J.
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2013, 59 (06) : E282 - E289
  • [5] Cost effectiveness of using trastuzumab biosimilars compared to trastuzumab original drugs to treat breast cancer in a hospital setting
    Barat, Eric C.
    Arrii, Marianne L. E.
    Soubieux-Bourbon, Annaelle
    Daouphars, Mikael
    Varin, Remi
    Tilleul, Patrick R.
    BREAST, 2023, 72
  • [6] The Impact of Emerging Safety and Effectiveness Evidence on the Use of Physician-administered Drugs The Case of Bevacizumab for Breast Cancer
    Conti, Rena M.
    Dusetzina, Stacie B.
    Herbert, Ann C.
    Berndt, Ernst R.
    Huskamp, Haiden A.
    Keating, Nancy L.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2013, 51 (07) : 622 - 627