Environmental co-benefits of energy efficiency improvement in coal-fired power sector: A case study of Henan Province, China

被引：47

作者：

Wang, Ke ^{[1
]}

Wang, Shanshan ^{[1
]}

Liu, Lei ^{[1
]}

Yue, Hui ^{[1
]}

Zhang, Ruiqin ^{[1
]}

Tang, Xiaoyan ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Coll Chem & Mol Engn, Res Inst Environm Sci, Zhengzhou 450001, Peoples R China

来源：

APPLIED ENERGY | 2016年 / 184卷

关键词：

Energy Conservation Supply Curve; Health benefit; Pollutant surcharge; Coal-fired power sector; China; EMISSION REDUCTION POTENTIALS; AIR-POLLUTION ABATEMENT; CEMENT INDUSTRY; MERCURY EMISSIONS; PLANTS; IRON; GENERATION; MODEL; TAX; MITIGATION;

D O I：

10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.059

中图分类号：

TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];

学科分类号：

0807 ; 0820 ;

摘要：

The coal-fired power sector is one of the major contributors to environmental problems and has great potential of air pollution abatement. This study employs Energy Conservation Supply Curves (ECSCs) combined with pollutant surcharge and health benefits to evaluate the environmental co-benefits of energy efficiency improvement in the coal-fired power sector. Health benefits and the pollution surcharge are considered as the environmental co-benefits that reduce costs of conserved energy (CCEs) in ECSCs. The health benefits of energy efficiency improvement are quantified using Intake Fraction method, while the pollutant surcharge is calculated based on the regulation. Three scenarios including a Business As Usual (BAU) scenario, an Energy Efficiency Improvement (EEI) scenario, and an Upgrading Standards and Incentive (USI) scenario is considered in a case study for Henan Province of China. Our results show that costs of conserved energy (CCEs) are reduced by 0.56 and 0.29 USD/GJ under the EEI and USI scenarios due to health benefits and pollutant surcharge reductions related to energy efficient technologies, respectively. In particular, health benefits account for 97% of the reductions in CCEs, while the pollutant surcharge only contributes 3%. Under the EEI and USI scenarios, in 2020, energy efficiency improvement reduces energy consumption in Henan's coal-fired power sector by 3.3% and 3.5% compared with the BAU scenario, respectively. The EEI and USI scenarios indicates that health benefits of 1.5 x 10(9) and 2.4 x 10(9) USD are gained and the reductions of pollutant surcharges of 197 and 226 million USD are realized in 2020, respectively. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：810 / 819

页数：10

共 66 条

[51] Mitigation Potential of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants in China [J].

Wang, Shuxiao ;

Zhang, Lei ;

Zhao, Bin ;

Meng, Yang ;

Hao, Jiming .

ENERGY & FUELS, 2012, 26 (08) :4635-4642

[52] Measures to improve the performance of China's thermal power industry in view of cost efficiency [J].

Wang, Yi-Shu ;

Xie, Bai-Chen ;

Shang, Li-Feng ;

Li, Wen-Hua .

APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 112 :1078-1086

[53] Energy-saving and emission-abatement potential of Chinese coal-fired power enterprise: A non-parametric analysis [J].

Wei, Chu ;

Loeschel, Andreas ;

Liu, Bing .

ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 49 :33-43

[54]

World Bank, 2007, IBRD41970 WORLD BANK

[55]

World Bank, 2002, CPL36060 WORLD BANK

[56]

World Bank, 2011, PROJ APPR DOC PROP L

[57]

World Bank, 2011, PROJ PAP PROP ADD LO

[58] Quantifying co-benefit potentials in the Chinese cement sector during 12th Five Year Plan: an analysis based on marginal abatement cost with monetized environmental effect [J].

Xi, Yang ;

Fei, Teng ;

Gehua, Wang .

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 58 :102-111

[59] Incorporating environmental co-benefits into climate policies: A regional study of the cement industry in China [J].

Yang Xi ;

Teng Fei ;

Wang Gehua .

APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 112 :1446-1453

[60] Trend of technology innovation in China's coal-fired electricity industry under resource and environmental constraints [J].

Yu, Fanxian ;

Chen, Jining ;

Sun, Fu ;

Zeng, Siyu ;

Wang, Can .

ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (03) :1586-1599

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →