En bloc esophageal mucosectomy for concentric circumferential mucosal resection (with video)

Background: With conventional EMR, specimens are fragmented, metaplasia may be left behind, and invasive lesions could be missed because of incomplete sampling. Concentric subtotal esophageal mucosectomy would address these limitations. Objective: To examine en bloc esophageal mucosectomy (EEM). Design: A prospective case series. Setting: An academic hospital. Subjects: Nine swine. Interventions: Conventional EMR was performed in the proximal esophagus. The submucosal space was entered, and the distal two thirds of the esophageal mucosa was freed with blunt dissection. A snare was threaded over the Column of mucosa to the gastroesophageal junction. The column was resected, and the mucosa was retrieved. Main Outcome and Measurements: Clinical examination, follow-up endoscopy, necropsy, and gross and histopathologic examination. Results: EEM permitted Subtotal esophageal mucosectomy in 9 of 9 swine (tissue specimens removed ranged 9-15 cm in length). The mean procedure duration was 110 minutes. In the survival series, 4 of 4 swine thrived after Surgery, for 9 to 13 clays. At 9 clays, there was no evidence of a perforation, Stricture, or leak. At 13 clays, 2 swine had a mild proximal stricture, which was easily traversed with a 9.8-mm gastroscope. On necropsy, the mediastinal and thoracic cavities were unremarkable in 3 of 4 swine. One swine was found to have a contained abscess containing cellulose, presumably secondary to ingestion of wood-chip bedding material postoperatively Reepithelialization was present on histologic examination. Limitations: An animal study. Conclusions: EEM is feasible and enabled concentric subtotal esophageal mucosal resection. The technique I could completely and circumferentially excise intramucosal lesions. Longer follow-up and larger studies are I needed to evaluate infection, stricture, and safety.