Taking a Stand: The Genetics Community's Responsibility for Intelligence Research

被引:15
作者
Callier, Shawneequa L. [1 ,2 ]
Bonham, Vence L. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Res, Bioeth & Hlth Care Law & Regulat, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[3] NHGRI, Div Intramural Res, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] Social & Behav Res Branch, Hlth Dispar Res Unit, Bethesda, MD USA
关键词
SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1002/hast.500
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
There is a longstanding debate about genetics research into intelligence. Some scholars question the value of focusing on genetic contributions to intelligence in a society where social and environmental determinants powerfully influence cognitive ability and educational outcomes. Others warn that censoring certain research questions, such as inquiries about genetic differences in intellectual potential, compromises academic freedom. Still others view interest in this subject as a corollary to a long and troublesome history of eugenics research. The dawn of a new era in genome sequencing as a commodity will sustain scientific interest in the genetics of intelligence for the foreseeable future, but deep-rooted challenges threaten the scientific merit of the research. The use of imprecise definitions of study populations, the difficult nature of studying the environment, and the potential of researcher bias are inextricably linked with concerns about the trustworthiness and utility of research in this area. Leadership by the genetics community is essential to ensure the value and trustworthiness of these studies.
引用
收藏
页码:S54 / S58
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
American Society of Human Genetics, 2007, POL STAT ASHG RESP R
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, NY TIMES
[3]  
Asbury K., 2013, G is for Genes: The Impact of Genetics on Education and Achievement
[4]   Can Genetics Research Benefit Educational Interventions for All? [J].
Asbury, Kathryn .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2015, 45 :S39-S42
[5]  
Baldwin James, 1985, PRICE TICKET COLLECT, P410
[6]   Gene-Environment Interplay in Common Complex Diseases: Forging an Integrative Model-Recommendations From an NIH Workshop [J].
Bookman, Ebony B. ;
McAllister, Kimberly ;
Gillanders, Elizabeth ;
Wanke, Kay ;
Balshaw, David ;
Rutter, Joni ;
Reedy, Jill ;
Shaughnessy, Daniel ;
Agurs-Collins, Tanya ;
Paltoo, Dina ;
Atienza, Audie ;
Bierut, Laura ;
Kraft, Peter ;
Fallin, M. Daniele ;
Perera, Frederica ;
Turkheimer, Eric ;
Boardman, Jason ;
Marazita, Mary L. ;
Rappaport, Stephen M. ;
Boerwinkle, Eric ;
Suomi, Stephen J. ;
Caporaso, Neil E. ;
Hertz-Picciotto, Irva ;
Jacobson, Kristen C. ;
Lowe, William L. ;
Goldman, Lynn R. ;
Duggal, Priya ;
Gunnar, Megan R. ;
Manolio, Teri A. ;
Green, Eric D. ;
Olster, Deborah H. ;
Birnbaum, Linda S. .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 35 (04) :217-225
[7]   The Genetic Ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States [J].
Bryc, Katarzyna ;
Durand, Eric Y. ;
Macpherson, J. Michael ;
Reich, David ;
Mountain, Joanna L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2015, 96 (01) :37-53
[8]   Darwin 200: Should scientists study race and IQ? YES: The scientific truth must be pursuedYES: The scientific truth must be pursued [J].
Ceci, Stephen ;
Williams, Wendy M. .
NATURE, 2009, 457 (7231) :788-789
[9]   Implicit prejudice and stereotyping: How automatic are they? Introduction to the special section [J].
Devine, PG .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (05) :757-759
[10]  
Duster T., 1990, BACKDOOR EUGENICS, P11