Poststerilization regret: Findings from the United States collaborative review of sterilization

被引:189
作者
Hillis, SD [1 ]
Marchbanks, PA [1 ]
Tylor, LR [1 ]
Peterson, HB [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, DRH, NCCDPHP K34, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00539-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the cumulative probability of regret after tubal sterilization, and to identify risk factors for regret that are identifiable before sterilization. Methods: We used a prospective, multicenter cohort study to evaluate the cumulative probability of regret within 14 years after tubal sterilization. Participants included 11,232 women aged 18-44 years who had tubal sterilizations between 1978 and 1987. Actuarial life tables and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify those groups at greatest risk of experiencing regret. Results: The cumulative probability of expressing regret during a follow-up interview within 14 years after tubal sterilization was 20.3% for women aged 30 or younger at the time of sterilization and 5.9% for women over age 30 at sterilization (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6, 2.3). For the former group, the cumulative probability of regret was similar for women sterilized during the postpartum period (after cesarean, 20.3%, 95% CI 14.5, 26.0; after vaginal delivery, 23.7%, 95% CI 17.6, 29.8) and for women sterilized within 1 year after the birth of their youngest child (22.3%, 95% CI 16.4, 28.2). For women aged 30 or younger at sterilization, the cumulative probability of regret decreased as time since the birth of the youngest child increased (2-3 years, 16.2%, 95% CI 11.4, 21.0; 4-7 years, 11.3%, 95% CI 7.8, 14.8; 8 or more years, 8.3%, 95% CI 5.1, 11.4) and was lowest among women who had no previous births (6.3%, 95% CI 3.1, 9.4). Conclusion: Although most women expressed no regret after tubal sterilization, women 30 years of age and younger at the time of sterilization had an increased probability of expressing regret during follow-up interviews within 14 years after the procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 895
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] MOSHER WD, 1990, DHHS PUBL, P182
  • [12] The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: Findings from the US collaborative review of sterilization
    Peterson, HB
    Xia, ZS
    Hughes, JM
    Wilcox, LS
    Tylor, LR
    Trussell, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 174 (04) : 1161 - 1168
  • [13] SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES ON VOLUNTARY STERILIZATION - A REVIEW
    PHILLIBER, SG
    PHILLIBER, WW
    [J]. STUDIES IN FAMILY PLANNING, 1985, 16 (01) : 1 - 29
  • [14] EVALUATION OF REGRET AFTER TUBAL-STERILIZATION
    PLATZCHRISTENSEN, JJ
    TRONSTAD, SE
    JOHANSSON, O
    CARLSSON, SA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1992, 38 (03) : 223 - 226
  • [15] RULIN MC, 1989, OBSTET GYNECOL, V74, P149
  • [16] FEMALE STERILIZATIONS IN THE UNITED-STATES, 1987
    SCHWARTZ, DB
    WINGO, PA
    ANTARSH, L
    SMITH, JC
    [J]. FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1989, 21 (05): : 209 - 212
  • [17] TUBAL-STERILIZATION AND THE LONG-TERM RISK OF HYSTERECTOMY
    STERGACHIS, A
    SHY, KK
    GROTHAUS, LC
    WAGNER, EH
    HECHT, JA
    ANDERSON, G
    NORMAND, EH
    RABOUD, J
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 264 (22): : 2893 - 2898
  • [18] TORRENCE GW, 1993, HLTH STATUS HLTH POL, P381
  • [19] TUBAL-STERILIZATION - QUESTIONING THE DECISION
    WARREN, CW
    MONTEITH, RS
    JOHNSON, JT
    OBERLE, MW
    [J]. POPULATION STUDIES-A JOURNAL OF DEMOGRAPHY, 1988, 42 (03): : 407 - 418
  • [20] WILCOX LS, 1991, FERTIL STERIL, V55, P927