Initial validation of symptom scores derived from the orthostatic discriminant and severity scale

被引:5
|
作者
Baker, Jacquie [1 ,3 ]
Paturel, Justin R. [1 ]
Sletten, David M. [4 ]
Low, Phillip A. [4 ]
Kimpinski, Kurt [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Neurol Sci, London Hlth Sci Ctr, Rm C7-131,339 Windermere Rd, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, London, ON, Canada
[3] Western Univ, Sch Kinesiol, London, ON, Canada
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
Orthostatic intolerance; Autonomic dysfunction; Autonomic reflex screen; Questionnaires; AUTONOMIC FAILURE; TACHYCARDIA;
D O I
10.1007/s10286-018-0511-5
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveTo develop a scale to quantify and discriminate orthostatic from non-orthostatic symptoms. In the current study, we present validation and reliability of orthostatic and non-orthostatic symptom scores taken from the orthostatic discriminate and severity scale (ODSS).MethodsValidity and reliability were assessed in participants with and without orthostatic intolerance. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating symptoms scores with previously validated tools [autonomic symptom profile (ASP) and the orthostatic hypotension questionnaire (OHQ)]. Clinical validity was assessed by correlating scores against standardized autonomic testing. Test-retest reliability was calculated using an intra-class correlation coefficient.ResultsConvergent validity: orthostatic (OS) and non-orthostatic (NS) symptom scores from 77 controls and 67 patients with orthostatic intolerance were highly correlated with both the orthostatic intolerance index of the ASP (OS: r=0.903; NS: r=0.651; p<0.001) and the composite score of the OHQ: (OS: r=0.800; NS: r=0.574; p<0.001). Clinical validity: symptom scores were significantly correlated with the total composite autonomic severity score (OS: r=0.458; NS: r=0.315; p<0.001), and the systolic blood pressure change during head-up tilt (OS: r=-0.445; NS: r=-0.354; p<0.001). In addition, patients with orthostatic intolerance had significantly higher symptom scores compared to controls (OS: 66.518.1 vs. 17.4 +/- 12.9; NS: 19.9 +/- 11.3 vs. 10.2 +/- 6.8; p<0.001, respectively). Test-retest reliability: Both orthostatic and non-orthostatic symptom scores were highly reliable (OS: r=0.956 and NS: r=0.574, respectively; p<0.001) with an internal consistency of 0.978 and 0.729, respectively.Interpretation Our initial results demonstrate that the ODSS is capable of producing valid and reliable orthostatic and non-orthostatic symptom scores. Further studies are ongoing to test sensitivity, specificity and symptom severity.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 112
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validation of the PCL-5 Symptom Severity Scale Embedded Symptom Validity Index in a Cross-Cultural Forensic Sample
    Snodgrass, Makenna
    Schroeder, Ryan W.
    Spector, Jack
    Bieu, Rachel
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 39 (07) : 1235 - 1235
  • [32] Validation of a manic-like symptom scale from the positive and negative syndrome scale
    Brown, E
    Lindenmayer, JP
    Baker, R
    Shao, L
    Schuh, L
    Tohen, M
    Stauffer, V
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 12 : S257 - S257
  • [33] Validation of the scale for symptom severity of circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders - the second stage study
    Kitajima, T.
    Hirose, M.
    Kumagai, R.
    Yamamoto, S.
    Esaki, Y.
    Funahashi, K.
    Fujita, A.
    Ishihara, K.
    Shinoda, Y.
    Nishii, Y.
    Hamanaka, S.
    Iwata, N.
    JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, 2022, 31
  • [34] Comparison of injury severity scores derived from ICD-10-AM codes with trauma registry derived scores: A study from New Zealand
    Montoya, Luisa
    Davie, Gabrielle
    Lilley, Rebbecca
    Dicker, Bridget
    Kool, Bridget
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2024, 55 (05):
  • [35] Age-specific questionnaires distinguish GERD symptom frequency and severity in infants and young children: Development and initial validation
    Deal, L
    Gold, TD
    Gremse, DA
    Winter, HS
    Peters, SB
    Fraga, PD
    Mack, ME
    Gaylord, SM
    Tolia, I
    Fitzgerald, JF
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2005, 41 (02): : 178 - 185
  • [36] FATIGUE IN PEOPLE WITH EPILEPSY. THE VALIDATION OF THE FATIGUE SYMPTOM INVENTORY, THE FATIGUE ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT AND THE FATIGUE SEVERITY SCALE
    Tellez-Zenteno, Jose F.
    Hernandez, L.
    Moien-Afshari, F.
    Knox, K.
    Britz, J.
    EPILEPSIA, 2009, 50 : 53 - 53
  • [37] Continued Validation of the RBD Symptom Severity Scale (RBDSSS) in Participants of the North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) Consortium
    Busicescu, Andrea
    Choudhury, Parichita
    Lee-Iannotti, Joyce
    Rangan, Pooja
    Fantini, Maria Livia
    Shprecher, David
    Lim, Miranda
    Elliott, John
    Avidan, Alon
    Huddleston, Daniel
    Bliwise, Donald
    Howell, Michael
    Schenck, Carlos
    Criswell, Susan
    Xiong, Chengjie
    McLeland, Jennifer
    During, Emmanuel
    Mignot, Emmanuel
    Pelletier, Amelie
    Gagnon, Jean-Francois
    Forsberg, Leah
    Fields, Julie
    St Louis, Erik
    Videnovic, Aleksandar
    Ju, Yo-El
    Boeve, Bradley
    Postuma, Ronald
    NEUROLOGY, 2023, 100 (17)
  • [38] Ultrasound derived-parameters and symptom severity scores as noninvasive predictors of bladder outlet obstruction in patients with benign prostatic enlargement
    Aisuodionoe-Shadrach, Oseremen
    Kolade-Yunusa, Hadijat Oluseyi
    Sadiq, Abu
    WEST AFRICAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (02) : 95 - 99
  • [39] Validation of a 7-point Global Overall Symptom scale to measure the severity of dyspepsia symptoms in clinical trials
    Van Zanten, SJOV
    Chiba, N
    Armstrong, D
    Barkun, AN
    Thomson, ABR
    Mann, V
    Escobedo, S
    Chakraborty, B
    Nevin, K
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 23 (04) : 521 - 529
  • [40] Construct validation of scores from a modified version of the Psychological Need Thwarting Scale
    Gunnell, Katie E.
    Crocker, Peter R. E.
    Mack, Diane E.
    Wilson, Philip M.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 34 : S232 - S232