The efficacy of azithromycin and doxycycline for the treatment of rectal chlamydia infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:96
作者
Kong, Fabian Yuh Shiong [1 ]
Tabrizi, Sepehr N. [2 ,3 ]
Fairley, Christopher Kincaid [4 ,5 ]
Vodstrcil, Lenka A. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Huston, Wilhelmina M. [6 ]
Chen, Marcus [5 ]
Bradshaw, Catriona [5 ]
Hocking, Jane S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Ctr Biostat & Epidemiol, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[3] Royal Womens Hosp, Dept Microbiol & Infect Dis, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Cent Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic 3053, Australia
[5] Melbourne Sexual Hlth Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3053, Australia
[6] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Biomed Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
rectal chlamydia; meta-analysis; treatment efficacy; azithromycin; doxycycline; SEXUALLY-TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS; TRACHOMATIS INFECTION; NEISSERIA-GONORRHOEAE; MEN; HIV; TRANSMISSION; PREVALENCE; SEX; MANAGEMENT; RISK;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dku574
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: There are increasing concerns about treatment failure following treatment for rectal chlamydia with 1 g of azithromycin. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the efficacy of 1 g of azithromycin as a single dose or 100 mg of doxycycline twice daily for 7 days for the treatment of rectal chlamydia. Methods: Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Register and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to the end of April 2014. Studies using 1 g of azithromycin or 7 days of doxycycline for the treatment of rectal chlamydia were eligible. Gender, diagnostic test, serovar, symptomatic status, other sexually transmitted infections, follow-up time, attrition and microbial cure were extracted. Meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled (i) azithromycin and doxycycline efficacy and (ii) efficacy difference. Results: All eight included studies were observational. The random-effects pooled efficacy for azithromycin (based on eight studies) was 82.9% (95% CI 76.0%-89.8%; I-2 = 71.0%; P<0.01) and for doxycycline (based on five studies) was 99.6% (95% CI 98.6%-100%; I-2 = 0%; P = 0.571), resulting in a random-effects pooled efficacy difference (based on five studies) of 19.9% (95% CI 11.4%-28.3%; I-2 = 48.5%; P = 0.101) in favour of doxycycline. Conclusions: The efficacy of single-dose azithromycin may be considerably lower than 1 week of doxycycline for treating rectal chlamydia. However, the available evidence is very poor. Robust randomized controlled trials are urgently required.
引用
收藏
页码:1290 / 1297
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Rectal chlamydia-a reservoir of undiagnosed infection in men who have sex with men [J].
Annan, N. T. ;
Sullivan, A. K. ;
Nori, A. ;
Naydenova, P. ;
Alexander, S. ;
McKenna, A. ;
Azadian, B. ;
Mandalia, S. ;
Rossi, M. ;
Ward, H. ;
Nwokolo, N. .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2009, 85 (03) :176-179
[2]  
[Anonymous], NUMB NOT CHLAM INF A
[3]  
[Anonymous], CHLAM
[4]  
[Anonymous], AUSTR STI MAN GUID U
[5]  
[Anonymous], SEX TRANSM INF ANN D
[6]  
[Anonymous], Global prevalence and incidence of selected curable sexually transmitted infections: overview and estimates
[7]  
[Anonymous], SEX HLTH
[8]  
[Anonymous], REP 2011 SURV DAT 20
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2 NATL SEXUALLY TRAN
[10]   HIV transmission risk through anal intercourse: systematic review, meta-analysis and implications for HIV prevention [J].
Baggaley, Rebecca F. ;
White, Richard G. ;
Boily, Marie-Claude .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 39 (04) :1048-1063