Unpacking the ambiguity of rework in construction: making sense of the literature

被引:32
作者
Love, Peter [1 ]
Smith, Jim [2 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Civil & Mech Engn, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Bond Univ, Fac Business, Gold Coast, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Digitisation; error; learning; quality; productivity; rework; ERROR MANAGEMENT; INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS; DEFECTS; DESIGN; COSTS; SYSTEM; MODEL; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1080/10286608.2019.1577396
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Rework is a pervasive problem that stymies practice in construction. A considerable amount of research has been undertaken to address rework, but there has been limited progress made in reducing its occurrence and adverse consequences. Many such studies have identified singular causal factors and have not acknowledged the interdependency and complex relationships that contribute to rework. To understand the nature of rework causation therefore requires the adoption of systems thinking as it bolsters the ability to understand the structural dynamics of a project's systems and thus enable managers and decision-makers to identify and avoid its unintended consequences. When an improved understanding of rework causation emerges, then the benefit of digital technologies will be able to be realised in practice. This paper reviews the extant literature and unpacks the ambiguity that surrounds the problem of rework. The paper suggests that by taking a systemic view where patterns of behaviour are observed and the underlying structures that drive rework are identified and understood, the academic community and practitioners will be better positioned to develop robust rework containiment and reduction strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 203
页数:24
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [1] Abdul-Rahman H., 1997, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, V14, P464, DOI DOI 10.1108/02656719710170693
  • [2] Aiyetan A., 2013, Interim: Interdisciplinary Journal, V12, P1
  • [3] Analysis of Causes of Construction Defects Using Fault Trees and Risk Importance Measures
    Aljassmi, Hamad
    Han, Sangwon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 139 (07) : 870 - 880
  • [4] [Anonymous], CAN J CIV ENG
  • [5] Aoieong R.T., 2002, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V20, P179, DOI [10.1080/01446190110109157, DOI 10.1080/01446190110109157]
  • [6] Ashford J.L., 1992, The management of quality in construction
  • [7] Atkinson A.R., 2002, ENG CONSTR ARCHIT MA, V9, P53, DOI DOI 10.1108/EB021206
  • [8] Atkinson AR., 1999, STRUCT SURV, V17, P231, DOI [10.1108/02630809910303006, DOI 10.1108/02630809910303006]
  • [9] Atkinson G., 1987, Building, P54
  • [10] Baccarini D., 1996, International Journal of Project Management, V14, P201, DOI 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3