Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review Assessing the Efficacy of Dialectical Behavior Therapy ( DBT)

被引:168
作者
Panos, Patrick T. [1 ]
Jackson, John W. [2 ]
Hasan, Omar [2 ]
Panos, Angelea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
meta-analysis; outcome study; borderline personality disorder (BPD); randomized controlled trial (RCT); evidence-based practice; methodological article; mental health; field of practice; TAU; adults; population; suicide prevention; attrition; dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT); BORDERLINE PERSONALITY-DISORDER; TRIAL; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1177/1049731513503047
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective was to quantitatively and qualitatively examine the efficacy of DBT (e.g., decreasing life-threatening suicidal and parasuicidal acts, attrition, and depression) explicitly with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and using conservative assumptions and criteria, across treatment providers and settings. Method: Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified in a systematic search that examined the efficacy of DBT in reducing suicide attempts, parasuicidal behavior, attrition during treatment, or symptoms of depression, in adult patients with BPD. Results: Combining effect measures for suicide and parasuicidal behavior (five studies total) revealed a net benefit in favor of DBT (pooled Hedges' g -0.622). DBT was only marginally better than treatment as usual (TAU) in reducing attrition during treatment in five RCTs (pooled risk difference -0.168). DBT was not significantly different from TAU in reducing depression symptoms in three RCTs (pooled Hedges' g -0.896). Discussion: DBT demonstrates efficacy in stabilizing and controlling self-destructive behavior and improving patient compliance.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 223
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association Practice Guidelines, 2001, Am J Psychiatry, V158, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, COGNITIVE BEHAV THER
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[4]   A METHOD FOR ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL [J].
CHALMERS, TC ;
SMITH, H ;
BLACKBURN, B ;
SILVERMAN, B ;
SCHROEDER, B ;
REITMAN, D ;
AMBROZ, A .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1981, 2 (01) :31-49
[5]  
Choi-Kain LoisW., 2009, Psychiatric Times, V26, P35
[6]   Evaluating three treatments for borderline personality disorder: A multiwave study [J].
Clarkin, John F. ;
Levy, Kenneth N. ;
Lenzenweger, Mark F. ;
Kernberg, Otto F. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 164 (06) :922-928
[7]  
Conover WJ, 1999, Practical nonparametric statistics
[8]  
Dimeff L., 2001, The California Psychologist, V34, P10
[9]   Borderline personality disorder in primary care [J].
Gross, R ;
Olfson, M ;
Gameroff, M ;
Shea, S ;
Feder, A ;
Fuentes, M ;
Lantigua, R ;
Weissman, MM .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 162 (01) :53-60
[10]   METAANALYSIS OF SCREENING AND DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS [J].
HASSELBLAD, V ;
HEDGES, LV .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1995, 117 (01) :167-178