Changing legislation and legislating for change: fitness to stand trial and criminal responsibility evaluations

被引:0
作者
Pillay, Anthony L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Dept Behav Med, Durban, South Africa
关键词
COMPETENCE;
D O I
10.1177/0081246316678763
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 435
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 2013, HIST CONT
[2]   The Psychology of Advocacy and the Advocacy of Psychology [J].
Cohen, Karen R. ;
Lee, Catherine M. ;
McIlwraith, Robert .
CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE, 2012, 53 (03) :151-158
[3]   How Reliable Are Forensic Evaluations of Legal Sanity? [J].
Gowensmith, W. Neil ;
Murrie, Daniel C. ;
Boccaccini, Marcus T. .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2013, 37 (02) :98-106
[4]   Field Reliability of Competence to Stand Trial Opinions: How Often Do Evaluators Agree, and What Do Judges Decide When Evaluators Disagree? [J].
Gowensmith, W. Neil ;
Murrie, Daniel C. ;
Boccaccini, Marcus T. .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2012, 36 (02) :130-139
[5]   Competency to stand trial and criminal responsibility examinations: are there solutions to the extensive waiting list? [J].
Pillay, Anthony L. .
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 44 (01) :48-59
[6]  
Republic of South Africa, 2016, CRIM PROC A IN PRESS
[7]  
Tema N, 2012, SAJP-S AFR J PSYCHI, V18, P131
[8]   The Role of Psychologists in the South Australian Fitness to Stand Trial Process [J].
van der Wijngaart, Samantha ;
Hawkins, Russell ;
Golus, Peter .
PSYCHIATRY PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW, 2015, 22 (01) :75-93