Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: A systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA

被引:621
作者
Ruppert, Krista M. [1 ]
Kline, Richard J. [1 ,2 ]
Rahman, Md Saydur [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Rio Grande Valley, Sch Earth Environm & Marine Sci, Brownsville, TX 78520 USA
[2] Univ Texas Rio Grande Valley, Dept Biol, Brownsville, TX 78520 USA
来源
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION | 2019年 / 17卷
关键词
Environmental DNA; Metabarcoding; Methods; Monitoring; Applications; Systemic review; FLY-DERIVED DNA; DIET ANALYSIS; FUNGAL COMMUNITIES; ANCIENT DNA; BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; ARCTIC VEGETATION; REVEALS; WATER; SEDIMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00547
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a novel method of assessing biodiversity wherein samples are taken from the environment via water, sediment or air from which DNA is extracted, and then amplified using general or universal primers in polymerase chain reaction and sequenced using next-generation sequencing to generate thousands to millions of reads. From this data, species presence can be determined, and overall biodiversity assessed. It is an interdisciplinary method that brings together traditional field-based ecology with in-depth molecular methods and advanced computational tools. As an emerging monitoring method, there are many pitfalls and roadblocks to be considered and avoided, but the method may still have the ability to revolutionize modern biodiversity surveys for the molecular era. In this paper, we review the basic methodology, benefits, and concerns of eDNA metabarcoding, and systematically cover the applications of the method in global ecology thus far, including biodiversity monitoring across all habitats and taxonomic groups, ancient ecosystem reconstruction, plant-pollinator interactions, diet analysis, invasive species detection, pollution responses, and air quality monitoring. We also discuss the future applications of the method as well as expected technological advances and how they may impact the way that eDNA metabarcoding may used in the future. eDNA metabarcoding is a unique method still in development and will likely remain in flux for some time as technology advances and procedures become standardized. However, as metabarcoding is optimized and its use becomes more widespread, it is likely to become an essential tool for ecological monitoring and global conservation study. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 203 条
  • [91] Using DNA Metabarcoding to Identify the Floral Composition of Honey: A New Tool for Investigating Honey Bee Foraging Preferences
    Hawkins, Jennifer
    de Vere, Natasha
    Griffith, Adelaide
    Ford, Col R.
    Allainguillaume, Joel
    Hegarty, Matthew J.
    Baillie, Les
    Adams-Groom, Beverley
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [92] Implementation options for DNA-based identification into ecological status assessment under the European Water Framework Directive
    Hering, Daniel
    Borja, Angel
    Jones, J. Iwan
    Pont, Didier
    Boets, Pieter
    Bouchez, Agnes
    Bruce, Kat
    Drakare, Stina
    Hanfling, Bernd
    Kahlert, Maria
    Leese, Florian
    Meissner, Kristian
    Mergen, Patricia
    Reyjol, Yorick
    Segurado, Pedro
    Vogler, Alfried
    Kelly, Martyn
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2018, 138 : 192 - 205
  • [93] Unveiling the Diet of Elusive Rainforest Herbivores in Next Generation Sequencing Era? The Tapir as a Case Study
    Hibert, Fabrice
    Taberlet, Pierre
    Chave, Jerome
    Scotti-Saintagne, Caroline
    Sabatier, Daniel
    Richard-Hansen, Cecile
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (04):
  • [94] Holdaway R., 2017, N Z J ECOL, V41
  • [95] Tropical-forest mammals as detected by environmental DNA at natural saltlicks in Borneo
    Ishige, Taichiro
    Miya, Masaki
    Ushio, Masayuki
    Sado, Tetsuya
    Ushioda, Masaharu
    Maebashi, Kaori
    Yonechi, Risako
    Lagan, Peter
    Matsubayashi, Hisashi
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 210 : 281 - 285
  • [96] DNA metabarcoding reveals diverse diet of the three-spined stickleback in a coastal ecosystem
    Jakubaviciute, Egle
    Bergstrom, Ulf
    Eklof, Johan S.
    Haenel, Quiterie
    Bourlat, Sarah J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (10):
  • [97] Reliable, verifiable and efficient monitoring of biodiversity via metabarcoding
    Ji, Yinqiu
    Ashton, Louise
    Pedley, Scott M.
    Edwards, David P.
    Tang, Yong
    Nakamura, Akihiro
    Kitching, Roger
    Dolman, Paul M.
    Woodcock, Paul
    Edwards, Felicity A.
    Larsen, Trond H.
    Hsu, Wayne W.
    Benedick, Suzan
    Hamer, Keith C.
    Wilcove, David S.
    Bruce, Catharine
    Wang, Xiaoyang
    Levi, Taal
    Lott, Martin
    Emerson, Brent C.
    Yu, Douglas W.
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 16 (10) : 1245 - 1257
  • [98] Islands in the ice: detecting past vegetation on Greenlandic nunataks using historical records and sedimentary ancient DNA Meta-barcoding
    Jorgensen, Tina
    Kjaer, Kurt H.
    Haile, James
    Rasmussen, Morten
    Boessenkool, Sanne
    Andersen, Kenneth
    Coissac, Eric
    Taberlet, Pierre
    Brochmann, Christian
    Orlando, Ludovic
    Gilbert, M. Thomas P.
    Willerslev, Eske
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2012, 21 (08) : 1980 - 1988
  • [99] DNA metabarcoding illuminates dietary niche partitioning by African large herbivores
    Kartzinel, Tyler R.
    Chen, Patricia A.
    Coverdale, Tyler C.
    Erickson, David L.
    Kress, W. John
    Kuzmina, Maria L.
    Rubenstein, Daniel I.
    Wang, Wei
    Pringle, Robert M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (26) : 8019 - 8024
  • [100] Evaluating multiplexed next-generation sequencing as a method in palynology for mixed pollen samples
    Keller, A.
    Danner, N.
    Grimmer, G.
    Ankenbrand, M.
    von der Ohe, K.
    von der Ohe, W.
    Rost, S.
    Haertel, S.
    Steffan-Dewenter, I.
    [J]. PLANT BIOLOGY, 2015, 17 (02) : 558 - 566