Advance prediction of the March 11, 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake: A missed opportunity for disaster preparedness

被引:47
作者
Davis, C. [1 ]
Keilis-Borok, V. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kossobokov, V. [4 ,5 ]
Soloviev, A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Los Angeles Dept Water & Power, Geotech Engn Grp, Los Angeles, CA 90012 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Geophys & Planetary Phys, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Earthquake Predict Theory & Math Geophys, Moscow 117997, Russia
[5] Inst Phys Globe Paris, F-75238 Paris 05, France
关键词
Earthquake prediction; Forecast; Emergency management; Disaster preparedness; Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.03.001
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
There was a missed opportunity for implementing important disaster preparedness measures following an earthquake prediction that was announced as an alarm in mid-2001. This intermediate-term middle-range prediction was the initiation of a chain of alarms that successfully detected the time, region, and magnitude range for the magnitude 9.0 March 11, 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. The prediction chains were made using an algorithm called M8 and is the latest of many predictions tested worldwide for more than 25 years, the results of which show at least a 70% success rate. The earthquake detection could have been utilized to implement measures and improve earthquake preparedness in advance; unfortunately this was not done, in part due to the predictions' limited distribution and the lack of applying existing methods for using intermediate-term predictions to make decisions for taking action. The resulting earthquake and induced tsunami caused tremendous devastation to north-east Japan. Methods that were known in advance of the predication and further advanced during the prediction timeframe are presented in a scenario describing some possibilities on how the 2001 prediction may have been utilized to reduce significant damage, including damage to the Fukushima nuclear power plant, and to show prudent costeffective actions can be taken if the prediction certainty is known, but not necessarily high. The purpose of this paper is to show how the prediction information can be strategically used to enhance disaster preparedness and reduce future impacts from the world's largest earthquakes. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 32
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
[11]  
Eos. UNESCO/IASPEI Working Group on a Code of Practice for Earthquake Prediction, 1984, INT UNION GEODESY GE, V65, P115
[12]  
ESRI, 2011 TOH EARTHQ TSUN
[13]  
Gabrielov A., 1986, ALGORITHMS LONG TERM
[14]   CRITERIA OF HIGH SEISMICITY, DETERMINED BY PATTERN-RECOGNITION [J].
GELFAND, IM ;
KEILISBO.VI ;
RANZMAN, EJ ;
IZVEKOVA, ML ;
GUBERMAN, SI .
TECTONOPHYSICS, 1972, 13 (1-4) :415-&
[15]  
Gelfand IM, 1972, T ACAD SCI USSR, V202, P1317
[16]   Extreme events: dynamics, statistics and prediction [J].
Ghil, M. ;
Yiou, P. ;
Hallegatte, S. ;
Malamud, B. D. ;
Naveau, P. ;
Soloviev, A. ;
Friederichs, P. ;
Keilis-Borok, V. ;
Kondrashov, D. ;
Kossobokov, V. ;
Mestre, O. ;
Nicolis, C. ;
Rust, H. W. ;
Shebalin, P. ;
Vrac, M. ;
Witt, A. ;
Zaliapin, I. .
NONLINEAR PROCESSES IN GEOPHYSICS, 2011, 18 (03) :295-350
[17]  
Gorshkov A, 2003, SPRINGER SERIES SYNE, P239
[18]  
Gvishiani AD, 1978, PHYS EARTH, V9, P31
[19]  
Gvishiani AD, 1980, COMPUTATIONAL SEISMO, V13, P28
[20]  
Healy JH, 1992, 92401 M8 US GEOL SUR