Script concordance testing: From theory to practice: AMEE Guide No. 75

被引:102
作者
Lubarsky, Stuart [1 ]
Dory, Valerie [2 ]
Duggan, Paul [3 ]
Gagnon, Robert [4 ]
Charlin, Bernard [5 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A3, Canada
[2] Catholic Univ Louvain, IRSS, Louvain, Belgium
[3] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[4] Univ Montreal, Assessment Off, Fac Med, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[5] Univ Montreal, Dept Surg, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
关键词
VALIDITY EVIDENCE; MEDICAL-STUDENTS; UNCERTAINTY; CONTEXT; COMPETENCE; EXPERTISE; KNOWLEDGE; PANEL; TOOL;
D O I
10.3109/0142159X.2013.760036
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The script concordance test (SCT) is used in health professions education to assess a specific facet of clinical reasoning competence: the ability to interpret medical information under conditions of uncertainty. Grounded in established theoretical models of knowledge organization and clinical reasoning, the SCT has three key design features: (1) respondents are faced with ill-defined clinical situations and must choose between several realistic options; (2) the response format reflects the way information is processed in challenging problem-solving situations; and (3) scoring takes into account the variability of responses of experts to clinical situations. SCT scores are meant to reflect how closely respondents' ability to interpret clinical data compares with that of experienced clinicians in a given knowledge domain. A substantial body of research supports the SCT's construct validity, reliability, and feasibility across a variety of health science disciplines, and across the spectrum of health professions education from pre-clinical training to continuing professional development. In practice, its performance as an assessment tool depends on careful item development and diligent panel selection. This guide, intended as a primer for the uninitiated in SCT, will cover the basic tenets, theoretical underpinnings, and construction principles governing script concordance testing.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 193
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, HLTH MEASUREMENT SCA, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199231881.001.0001
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1984, TUTORIALS PROBLEM BA
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, Handbook of Test Development
  • [4] The psychometric properties of five scoring methods applied to the script concordance test
    Bland, AC
    Kreiter, CD
    Gordon, JA
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2005, 80 (04) : 395 - 399
  • [5] Measurement of perception and interpretation skills during radiology training: utility of the script concordance approach
    Brazeau-Lamontagne, L
    Charlin, B
    Gagnon, R
    Samson, L
    van der Vleuten, C
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2004, 26 (04) : 326 - 332
  • [6] Comparison of an aggregate scoring method with a consensus scoring method in a measure of clinical reasoning capacity
    Charlin, B
    Desaulniers, M
    Gagnon, R
    Blouin, D
    van der Vleuten, C
    [J]. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2002, 14 (03) : 150 - 156
  • [7] The Diagnosis Script Questionnaire: A New Tool to Assess a Specific Dimension of Clinical Competence
    Charlin, B.
    Brailovsky, C.
    Leduc, C.
    Blouin, D.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 1998, 3 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [8] Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: Theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research
    Charlin, BD
    Tardif, J
    Boshuizen, HPA
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (02) : 182 - 190
  • [9] Scripts and clinical reasoning
    Charlin, Bernard
    Boshuizen, Henny P. A.
    Custers, Eugene J.
    Feltovich, Paul J.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 41 (12) : 1178 - 1184
  • [10] Assessment of clinical reasoning in the context of uncertainty:: the effect of variability within the reference panel
    Charlin, Bernard
    Gagnon, Robert
    Pelletier, Jean
    Coletti, Michel
    Abi-Rizk, Grace
    Nasr, Claudine
    Sauve, Evelyne
    van der Vleuten, Cees
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2006, 40 (09) : 848 - 854