Does organizational reciprocity improve employees' motivation? The mediating role of basic psychological need satisfaction

被引:9
作者
Liu, Yuxin [1 ]
Zhu, Nan [1 ]
Zhang, Jianwei [2 ]
Raza, Jamshed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Business, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, 5 South Zhongguancun St, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Reciprocity; Autonomous motivation; Controlled motivation; Basic psychological need satisfaction; Autonomy support; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; AUTONOMOUS MOTIVATION; WORK MOTIVATION; SUPPORT; PAY; PERFORMANCE; ENGAGEMENT; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-020-00984-x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
While the effect of organizational reciprocity on employees' attitudes and behaviors has received much attention, the relationships between different forms of reciprocity and the quality of motivation remain largely unexplored. Building on social exchange theory and self-determination theory, we test a theoretical model integrating reciprocity and motivation based on survey data from 753 professional employees across China. We find that generalized and balanced reciprocity positively affect autonomous motivation and controlled motivation respectively, whereas negative reciprocity adversely influences both forms of motivation. Additionally, basic psychological need satisfaction mediates the associations between generalized reciprocity and autonomous motivation, and between negative reciprocity and autonomous motivation. Further, autonomy support is found to moderate the relationship between generalized reciprocity and basic psychological need satisfaction, and between negative reciprocity and basic psychological need satisfaction. Our findings thus suggest that different forms of reciprocity are integrally associated with two types of motivation.
引用
收藏
页码:3136 / 3150
页数:15
相关论文
共 75 条
[31]   Materialism does not pay: Materialistic students have lower motivation, engagement, and achievement [J].
King, Ronnel B. ;
Datu, Jesus Alfonso D. .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 49 :289-301
[32]   Work performance, affective commitment, and work motivation: the roles of pay administration and pay level [J].
Kuvaas, B .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2006, 27 (03) :365-385
[33]   Social and economic exchange relationships and performance contingency: differential effects of variable pay and base pay [J].
Kuvaas, Bard ;
Shore, Lynn M. ;
Buch, Robert ;
Dysvik, Anders .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 31 (03) :408-431
[34]   Do you get what you pay for? Sales incentives and implications for motivation and changes in turnover intention and work effort [J].
Kuvaas, Bard ;
Buch, Robert ;
Gagne, Marylene ;
Dysvik, Anders ;
Forest, Jacques .
MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2016, 40 (05) :667-680
[35]  
Li H, 2019, SCI TECHNOLOGY PROGR, V36, P135
[36]  
Liu Y., 2011, SCI SCI MANAGEMENT S, V32, P162
[37]   Making Sense of Chinese Employees' Suicide Ideation: Does Meaning in Life Matter? [J].
Liu, Yuxin ;
Usman, Muhammad ;
Zhang, Jianwei ;
Raza, Jamshed ;
Gul, Habib .
OMEGA-JOURNAL OF DEATH AND DYING, 2021, 83 (02) :212-238
[38]   From pay to praise? Non-cash employee recognition in Canadian and Australian firms [J].
Long, Richard J. ;
Shields, John L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 21 (08) :1145-1172
[39]   JOB AUTONOMY IN RELATION TO WORK ENGAGEMENT AND WORKAHOLISM: MEDIATION OF AUTONOMOUS AND CONTROLLED WORK MOTIVATION [J].
Malinowska, Diana ;
Tokarz, Aleksandra ;
Wardzichowska, Anna .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2018, 31 (04) :445-458
[40]   Enriching the hierarchical model of achievement motivation: Autonomous and controlling reasons underlying achievement goals [J].
Michou, Aikaterini ;
Vansteenkiste, Maarten ;
Mouratidis, Athanasios ;
Lens, Willy .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 84 (04) :650-666