Does organizational reciprocity improve employees' motivation? The mediating role of basic psychological need satisfaction

被引:9
作者
Liu, Yuxin [1 ]
Zhu, Nan [1 ]
Zhang, Jianwei [2 ]
Raza, Jamshed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Business, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, 5 South Zhongguancun St, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Reciprocity; Autonomous motivation; Controlled motivation; Basic psychological need satisfaction; Autonomy support; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; AUTONOMOUS MOTIVATION; WORK MOTIVATION; SUPPORT; PAY; PERFORMANCE; ENGAGEMENT; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-020-00984-x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
While the effect of organizational reciprocity on employees' attitudes and behaviors has received much attention, the relationships between different forms of reciprocity and the quality of motivation remain largely unexplored. Building on social exchange theory and self-determination theory, we test a theoretical model integrating reciprocity and motivation based on survey data from 753 professional employees across China. We find that generalized and balanced reciprocity positively affect autonomous motivation and controlled motivation respectively, whereas negative reciprocity adversely influences both forms of motivation. Additionally, basic psychological need satisfaction mediates the associations between generalized reciprocity and autonomous motivation, and between negative reciprocity and autonomous motivation. Further, autonomy support is found to moderate the relationship between generalized reciprocity and basic psychological need satisfaction, and between negative reciprocity and basic psychological need satisfaction. Our findings thus suggest that different forms of reciprocity are integrally associated with two types of motivation.
引用
收藏
页码:3136 / 3150
页数:15
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings
    Baard, PP
    Deci, EL
    Ryan, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 34 (10) : 2045 - 2068
  • [2] Bagozzi R. P., 1988, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, V16, P74, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327, DOI 10.1007/BF02723327, 10.1007/BF02723327]
  • [3] Bandalos D.L., 2001, ITEM PARCELING ISSUE, P269
  • [4] Organizational stressors and basic psychological needs: The mediating role of athletes' appraisal mechanisms
    Bartholomew, K. J.
    Arnold, R.
    Hampson, R. J.
    Fletcher, D.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2017, 27 (12) : 2127 - 2139
  • [5] Blau P. M., 1964, EXCHANGE POWER SOC
  • [6] Brislin R.W., 1980, HDB CROSS CULTURAL P, V2, P389, DOI DOI 10.3390/HEALTHCARE6030093
  • [7] Using self-determination theory to understand the relationship between calling enactment and daily well-being
    Conway, Neil
    Clinton, Michael
    Sturges, Jane
    Budjanovcanin, Ali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2015, 36 (08) : 1114 - 1131
  • [8] Coyle-Shapiro J., 2004, EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS, DOI [10.1093/oso/9780199269136.003.0001, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780199269136.003.0001]
  • [9] How job characteristics relate to need satisfaction and autonomous motivation: implications for work effort
    De Cooman, Rein
    Stynen, Dave
    Van den Broeck, Anja
    Sels, Luc
    De Witte, Hans
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 43 (06) : 1342 - 1352
  • [10] Deci E. L., 1985, Springer eBooks, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7, 10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7]