Performance evaluation of the microINR® point-of-care INR-testing system

被引:5
作者
Joubert, J. [1 ,2 ]
van Zyl, M. C. [2 ]
Raubenheimer, J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Haematol Acad Labs, NHLS, Bloemfontein, South Africa
[2] Univ Free State, Dept Haematol & Cell Biol, Fac Hlth Sci, Bloemfontein, South Africa
[3] Univ Free State, Dept Biostat, Fac Hlth Sci, Bloemfontein, South Africa
[4] Univ Sydney, Discipline Pharmacol, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
international normalised ratio; micro international normalised ratio((R)); oral anticoagulant therapy; performance evaluation; point-of-care; COAGULATION MONITOR; PROTHROMBIN TIME; ACCURACY; PRECISION;
D O I
10.1111/ijlh.12749
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionPoint-of-care International Normalised Ratio (INR) testing is used frequently. We evaluated the microINR((R)) POC system for accuracy, precision and measurement repeatability, and investigated instrument and test chip variability and error rates. MethodsVenous blood INRs of 210 patients on warfarin were obtained with Thromborel((R)) S on the Sysmex CS-2100i((R)) analyser and compared with capillary blood microINR((R)) values. Precision was assessed using control materials. Measurement repeatability was calculated on 51 duplicate finger-prick INRs. Triplicate finger-prick INRs using three different instruments (30 patients) and three different test chip lots (29 patients) were used to evaluate instrument and test chip variability. ResultsLinear regression analysis of microINR((R)) and Sysmex CS2100i((R)) values showed a correlation coefficient of 0.96 (P<.0001) and a positive proportional bias of 4.4%. Dosage concordance was 93.8% and clinical agreement 95.7%. All acceptance criteria based on ISO standard 17593:2007 system accuracy requirements were met. Control material coefficients of variation (CV) varied from 6.2% to 16.7%. The capillary blood measurement repeatability CV was 7.5%. No significant instrument (P=.93) or test chip (P=.81) variability was found, and the error rate was low (2.8%). ConclusionThe microINR((R)) instrument is accurate and precise for monitoring warfarin therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 122
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, User verification of performance for precision and trueness
  • [2] approved guideline
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, EP09A2IR CLSI
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, SYSM CS2000I HEM SYS
  • [5] Bassi L, 2013, J THROMB HAEMOST, V11, P577
  • [6] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [7] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2009, H26P2 CLSI
  • [8] CLSI, 2004, POCT14A CLSI
  • [9] Data Innovations, 2013, EP EV REL 10 SOFTW V
  • [10] Deal A.M., 2009, A SAS Macro for Deming Regression, P1