The effect of altering spherical aberration on the static accommodative response

被引:26
作者
Theagarayan, Baskar [1 ,2 ]
Radhakrishnan, Hema [1 ,3 ]
Allen, Peter M. [1 ,2 ]
Calver, Richard I. [1 ,2 ]
Rae, Sheila M. [1 ,2 ]
O'Leary, Daniel J. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vis CRC, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Dept Optometry & Ophthalm Dispensing, Cambridge CB1 1PT, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Fac Life Sci, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Wales Coll Cardiff, Inst Cardiff, Res & Enterprise Serv, Cardiff CF5 2YB, S Glam, Wales
关键词
accommodative stimulus-response function; adaptation; COAS aberrometer; myopia; Shin-Nippon; treatment; NIPPON SRW-5000 AUTOREFRACTOR; HIGHER-ORDER ABERRATIONS; WAVE-FRONT ABERRATION; RETINAL IMAGE QUALITY; REFRACTIVE ERROR; MONOCHROMATIC ABERRATIONS; OPTICAL ABERRATIONS; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; OCULAR ABERRATIONS; EYE GROWTH;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00610.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
To investigate the effect of altering the spherical aberration (SA) of the eye on the static accommodative response. Participants were fitted with nominally afocal contact lenses with controlled amounts of SA of either -0.2, -0.1, 0.0, +0.1 or +0.2 mu m for a 5-mm pupil. Measurements of SA and root mean square (RMS) total aberration for the eye plus lens for each participant were determined with a Complete Ophthalmic Analysis System aberrometer. Accommodation was stimulated either by placing targets at different dioptric distances from the eye, or by using a fixed distance target and placing negative-powered lenses in front of the eye. Accommodation responses were determined with a Shin-Nippon autorefractor. For both stimuli situations, the slope of the accommodation stimulus-response function was lowest for the lenses with +0.2 mu m SA, and increased as the amount of SA was reduced. There was a significant negative correlation between SA and slope. Lag of accommodation at 33 cm correlated well with added SA, but did not correlate with total RMS error. There was no significant difference between the responses at 30 min after lens wear started and the responses after 1 h. Adding negative SA to the eye generally improves the slope of the accommodation stimulus-response curve and decreases lag of accommodation, and positive added SA depresses the slope of the stimulus-response curve and increases lag. The effect seems to be specific to SA, as there was no relationship between lag and RMS error. Altering SA may be a viable way of changing accommodative functions in clinical situations.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 71
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Abbott ML, 1998, OPHTHAL PHYSL OPT, V18, P13, DOI 10.1016/S0275-5408(97)00072-0
  • [2] Accommodation functions: Co-dependency and relationship to refractive error
    Allen, PM
    O'Leary, DJ
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (04) : 491 - 505
  • [3] Neural compensation for the eye's optical aberrations
    Artal, P
    Chen, L
    Fernández, EJ
    Singer, B
    Manzanera, S
    Williams, DR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2004, 4 (04): : 281 - 287
  • [4] CRITICAL SUBJECTIVE MEASUREMENT OF AMPLITUDE OF ACCOMMODATION
    ATCHISON, DA
    CAPPER, EJ
    MCCABE, KL
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1994, 71 (11) : 699 - 706
  • [5] Accommodation stimulus-response function and retinal image quality
    Buehren, T
    Collins, MJ
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (10) : 1633 - 1645
  • [6] STEADY-STATE ACCOMMODATION AND OCULAR BIOMETRY IN LATE-ONSET MYOPIA
    BULLIMORE, MA
    GILMARTIN, B
    ROYSTON, JM
    [J]. DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1992, 80 (02) : 143 - 155
  • [7] CORRELATION OF ACCOMMODATION BETWEEN THE 2 EYES
    CAMPBELL, FW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1960, 50 (07) : 738 - 738
  • [8] Refractive error and monochromatic aberrations in Singaporean children
    Carkeet, A
    Luo, HD
    Tong, L
    Saw, SM
    Tan, DTH
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2002, 42 (14) : 1809 - 1824
  • [9] Castejón-Mochón JF, 2002, VISION RES, V42, P1611, DOI 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00085-8
  • [10] Aberrations and myopia
    Charman, WN
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2005, 25 (04) : 285 - 301