Nonliteral language;
Mentalization;
Theory of mind;
Pragmatic language;
Figurative language;
Differential diagnostic;
IRI;
EMOTION RECOGNITION;
UNDERSTANDING MINDS;
FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE;
SOCIAL COGNITION;
SCHIZOPHRENIA;
APTNESS;
BRAIN;
CHILDREN;
ABILITY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113152
中图分类号:
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号:
100205 ;
摘要:
Research on figurative language has a long tradition in psychiatry, as it is employed in psychotherapy and its (mis)comprehension plays a substantial role in differential diagnostics of schizophrenic spectrum disorders. Although often associated with empathy and mentalization, it has never been addressed in borderline personality disorder (BPD). Therefore, this study investigated metaphor comprehension and its relationship to cognitive and affective empathy in 20 patients with BPD and 20 matched healthy controls who completed a metaphor task comprising conventional metaphors (CM), novel metaphors (NM), meaningless stimuli (MS), and a rating scale of familiarity, a factor known to influence performance. For cognitive and affective empathy, the interpersonal reactivity index was applied. At first patients with BPD seemed to have significantly more problems in comprehending CM, but not NM or MS, and were less familiar with CM. When familiarity with the stimulus was controlled, this difference disappeared. As for empathy, only fantasy was positively related to familiar CM beyond borderline symptoms. Results indicate that the comprehension of novel metaphorical meaning is preserved in patients with BPD.