Effects of prior knowledge on decisions made under perceptual vs. categorical uncertainty

被引:17
作者
Hansen, Kathleen A. [1 ]
Hillenbrand, Sarah F. [2 ]
Ungerleider, Leslie G. [1 ]
机构
[1] NIMH, Lab Brain & Cognit, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Helen Wills Neurosci Inst, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE | 2012年 / 6卷
关键词
prior probability; expectation; frontoparietal; dorsolateral prefrontal cortex;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2012.00163
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Humans use prior knowledge to bias decisions made under uncertainty. In this fMRI study we predicted that different brain dynamics play a role when prior knowledge is added to decisions made under perceptual vs. categorical uncertainty. Subjects decided whether shapes belonged to Category S - smoother or Category B - bumpier - under both uncertainty conditions, with or without prior knowledge cues. When present, the prior knowledge cue, 80/20 or 50/50, indicated that 80 and 20% (or 50 and 50%) were the chances that responding "S" and "B" (or vice versa) would be correct. During perceptual uncertainty, shapes were degraded with noise. During categorical uncertainty, shapes were ambiguous. Adding the 80/20 cue increased activation during perceptual uncertainty in bilateral lateral occipital (LO) cortex and left middle frontal gyrus (MidFG), and decreased activity in bilateral LO cortex during categorical uncertainty. Right MidFG and other frontoparietal regions were active in all conditions. The results demonstrate that left MidFG shows activation changes, suggestive of an influence on visual cortex, that depend on the factor that makes the decisions difficult. When sensory evidence is difficult to perceive, prior knowledge increases visual cortical activity. When the sensory evidence is easy to perceive but difficult to interpret, prior knowledge decreases visual cortical activity.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Negative BOLD differentiates visual imagery and perception [J].
Amedi, A ;
Malach, R ;
Pascual-Leone, A .
NEURON, 2005, 48 (05) :859-872
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics
[3]   Efficient design of event-related fMRI experiments using M-sequences [J].
Buracas, GT ;
Boynton, GM .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 16 (03) :801-813
[4]   AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages [J].
Cox, RW .
COMPUTERS AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 1996, 29 (03) :162-173
[5]  
Cox RW, 1997, NMR BIOMED, V10, P171, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1492(199706/08)10:4/5<171::AID-NBM453>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-L
[7]   Mechanisms of top-down facilitation in perception of visual objects studied by fMRI [J].
Eger, E. ;
Henson, R. N. ;
Driver, J. ;
Dolan, R. J. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2007, 17 (09) :2123-2133
[8]   Perceptual Expectation Evokes Category-Selective Cortical Activity [J].
Esterman, Michael ;
Yantis, Steven .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2010, 20 (05) :1245-1253
[9]   Human Brain Activity Predicts Individual Differences in Prior Knowledge Use during Decisions [J].
Hansen, Kathleen A. ;
Hillenbrand, Sarah F. ;
Ungerleider, Leslie G. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 24 (06) :1462-1475
[10]   Persistency of priors-induced bias in decision behavior and the fMRI signal [J].
Hansen, Kathleen A. ;
Hillenbrand, Sarah F. ;
Ungerleider, Leslie G. .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 5